• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Surprise! Oil Spill Commission Critical of Government Response

    President Obama’s National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling released four papers discussing several aspects of the federal response, including the use of dispersants and contingency plans for possible future spills. But a large part of the commission’s report and what’s garnering most of the attention in the media is the government’s mismanagement of the spill.

    One of the four paper says, “The federal government created the impression that it was either not fully competent to handle the spill or not fully candid with the American people about the scope of the problem.”

    The commission faults the Administration for underreporting the initial spill amounts and the Office of Management and Budget for denying requests from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to make worst-case scenarios known to the public. The report was also critical of the inefficiencies and the overreaction by the Unified Command Center. The Wall Street Journal reports:

    While Coast Guard personnel told the commission in interviews that they had enough equipment by the end of May, the president announced around that same time that he would triple the federal manpower responding to the spill. The paper calls this “the arguable overreaction to the public perception of a slow response.”

    The tripling effort resulted in resources being thrown at the problem in an inefficient way. For example, the commission paper says, the National Incident Command staffers thought they needed to buy every skimmer they could find, even though they were hearing that responders had enough skimmers.

    Not enough urgency in the beginning. Too much urgency when everything was under control. If the public was overreacting and the government responded to that overreaction, you wouldn’t know it. The government was quick and persistent in publicly slamming BP but not when it came to conveying messages to the public about the extent of the spill.

    The commission is right to point out that the legislation in place was never meant to handle an oil spill of this magnitude. State and local governments are more familiar with and prepared to respond through the Incident Command relationships as conducted through the National Response Framework by the authority of the Stafford Act. On the other hand, the Incident Command system established under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 is not well suited for handling multiple states and diverse jurisdictions within states.
    For example, during the Deepwater Horizon response, the Coast Guard had to establish liaison officers at the county level in order to facilitate a more harmonious relationship between local authorities and the Incident Command team. Furthermore, in the Gulf region, a major oil-producing area, preparations should account for the real possibility that there could have been a major hurricane during the course of the recovery.

    The President may well have had to exercise his authority under the Stafford Act, with the Federal Emergency Management Agency playing the lead role in hurricane recovery. Thus, under current laws the federal government could have two competing disaster operations occurring at the same time. This is nonsensical. The Oil Pollution Act should be amended to harmonize responses for Spills of National Significance with the National Response Framework.

    The commission is right to fault the Administration’s response effort. As we reported from the very get-go, the oil spill response was “stuck on stupid.”

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    7 Responses to Surprise! Oil Spill Commission Critical of Government Response

    1. ozzy6900 says:

      No surprise here! Mr. Obama was too busy on vacation (which one was this?) to worry about a little mishap in the Gulf. Once he decided that the spill was getting more attention than he was, Mr. Obama decided to finally do something. The problem was that by this time, things were being handled WITHOUT the government! Go figure that!

    2. Lloyd Scallan (New O says:

      Obama response was exactly what he intended. The HF had better recognize that not only the blow-out, but the failure of the BOP, greatly benefited Obama's efforts to futher his socialist aganda. He delibertly used ever means at his dispostal, including the USCG and other federal agencies, to increase the damage to the Gulf Coast.

    3. Ace Sez Bishop, Cali says:

      The Jone's Act is a maritime union agenda that stymied the international response to come help– with equiptment and expert personnel—there are professionals in the private sector (petroleum industry) that were pushed away by the gov't agencies.

      All in all it happened on Osambo's watch and the buck (failure to act compentenly) stops with him—whats more he hasn't learned any lesson from this Deepwater spill—thing's are just as they were in the begining of this tragedy except for the loss of thousands of incomes because of his distain for any and all private sector industries. Why can't Osambo just die tomorrow of natural causes?

    4. Potter says:

      Does anyone besides me think that perhaps this "mishap" in the Gulf could have been orchestrated by team Obama??

    5. Tim AZ says:

      It is a surprise that the regime could not force a favorable report from the oil spill commission. What's not surprising is that this regime would exploit any event for political gain. The most disturbing thing about the regime is that it appears that they regard the pain and discomfort forced upon the American people through their political exploits brings them pleasure. Any more hope and change any one?

    6. Rich Buckley, Liverm says:

      I believe US Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering (NA&OE) is the best agency to accept that role on an on-going basis, with the depth of resources needed to evolve, study and evaluate state-of-the-art high speed response technologies to marine disasters as a war-time engagement. We should not allow ourselves to be placed in the trap of leaping to the nuclear option to close runaway wells. Other containment methodologies can be developed in partnership with private industry and placed on a Manhattan Project scale of priority.

    7. John, Vancouver, Can says:

      "It is a surprise that the regime could not force a favorable report from the oil spill commission."

      Well yeah, of course that is exactly what would have happened under a Republican if they bothered to create a commission in the first place.

    8. Pingback: Surprise! Oil Spill Commission Critical of Government Response

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×