• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Your Education Dollars at Work

    Yesterday, President Obama traveled to New Mexico to deliver remarks on education at the home of a local Albuquerque family. According to the Associated Press, “Obama argued that Republicans would cut education spending to pay for tax cuts for the rich.”

    While the politics of Obama’s assertion can be left to debate by Members of Congress, it is clear that over the years, conservatives have pushed for policies that better target educational dollars. Instead of just throwing more money into the monolithic public education system, which in many instances ends up lining the pockets of education unions, conservative solutions include giving state leaders the freedom to opt out of federal education programs and consolidate federal funding, empowering them to better target education resources.

    Conservative solutions also include enabling state policymakers to permit parents to take their share of federal education funds to a school of their choice.

    Conservative solutions do not, however, include throwing more money at the failed status quo. Over the decades, education spending has increased rapidly, despite the fact that spending has no correlation with academic achievement. In fact, since the 1960s, real per-pupil federal education expenditures have more than tripled (after adjusting for inflation). Yet reading achievement has remained flat since that time, math achievement has improved only modestly, and graduation rates are the same today that they were in 1970.

    But over the past several decades, the left has been creating a crisis in education in four significant ways:

    1. Increasing spending to fund the bloated education bureaucracy. In 2010, the average salary at the Department of Education reached $103,000. By comparison, in 2009, the average public school teacher salary was $53,000.
    2. Empowering education unions that stifle education reform. With a budget of more than $355 million, the National Education Association spends more on campaign contributions than do ExxonMobil, Microsoft, Wal-Mart, and the AFL-CIO combined.
    3. Increasing non-teaching staff positions. Since 1970, student enrollment in public elementary and secondary schools has increased just 7 percent, while public elementary and secondary non-teaching staff hires have increased 83 percent.
    4. Squandering $100 billion in “stimulus” money. States are using stimulus funds to fill positions such as IT support, office staff, central administration staff, curriculum coordinators, district coordinators, recess aides, consultants, and federal program directors.

    Children certainly deserve better than policies that continue to throw more money at a broken system. Instead, Congress should work to free states from much of the bureaucratic red-tape handed down from Washington. In so doing, state leaders would be empowered with increased control over education funding, which would advance excellence and innovation.

    Posted in Education [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to Your Education Dollars at Work

    1. Pingback: Are there any real work from home jobs, other than surveys or data entry? — GuruWatch On The Internet Marketing Experts

    2. Pingback: POLITICAL DIGEST, CONSERVATIVE NEWS 10/06/2010 at Desert Conservative

    3. Pingback: Prez to Lackeys: “No Money Left, Let’s Cut Defense” – On NewsRealBlog | nampion.com

    4. Anita Clattenburg/Wy says:

      There are no quick fixes; but to target the teachers and their benefits is not right. If we want a solution for "no child left behind", communication between teachers, administration, etc. and the government on how to reform education is crucial. We need to look at the variables and compare apples with apples. If we have a poor district, we cannot take away monies that are allocated to educate children, without evaluating the impact that may be created. Arrogance and lies should stay out of education. To leave poor districts with no tax base with large classroom without sufficient qualified staff is wrong. Say what you may, but giving tax breaks to the rich is inequity. Taking away from school's budgets to give to the rich appears inhuman. Greed is not a winner in the eyes of the Beholder!

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×