• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Take Off Rose-Colored Glasses when it comes to Taliban Reconciliation


    Before concluding that today’s New York Times article on Taliban outreach to Karzai means that an Afghan settlement is on the horizon, consider today’s other news from Afghanistan, which includes a suicide attack that killed the Deputy Governor of Afghanistan’s Ghazni province. The point is the Taliban may be reaching out to the Karzai government less to negotiate a compromise and more toward establishing a perception of their inevitable return to power in the country. A recent Wall Street Journal article reports that key leaders of Afghanistan’s ethnic minority communities oppose President Karzai’s outreach to the Taliban, which they say could lead to the Taliban’s return to power and the outbreak of ethnic-based civil war.

    Good strategy on the U.S. part would involve willingness to back negotiations between the Afghan government and Taliban leadership only when an assessment is made that the Taliban is ready for compromise. Such a compromise would have to involve the Taliban breaking ranks with al-Qaeda and disavowing the global terrorist agenda and committing to maintaining rights for women and minorities. Otherwise, U.S. blood and treasure invested in Afghanistan over the last nine years will have been for nothing.

    As U.S. diplomats learned in the 1990s through numerous face-to-face meetings with the Taliban that went nowhere, much time can be wasted in seeking negotiations for negotiations sake and without a strategy for influencing the other side’s calculations. While reintegration of insurgents is part and parcel of any good counterinsurgency strategy, it is necessary to distinguish this process from one that would legitimize a harsh and violent Islamist ideology, such as the Taliban pursued during their time in power. As Mitchell Reiss, author of Negotiating with Evil: When to Talk to Terrorists, recently noted, the Obama administration needs to “increase American leverage and revise the Taliban’s calculations” before it can negotiate a settlement that protects vital U.S. national security interests.

    American leverage with Pakistan’s military leaders has remained largely elusive when it comes to shifting their strategy on Afghanistan. Billions in U.S. aid to Pakistan have helped encourage stability and security inside Pakistan and cooperation in breaking up global terrorist networks. However, U.S. and Pakistan strategies toward Afghanistan are still at odds with one another and create tension in the relationship.

    So rather than being led down the garden path by dreams of Taliban reconciliation, U.S. policy instead needs to focus more intently on creating the conditions in the region that will ultimately bring about real compromise from the Taliban. This includes – but is not limited to — developing more effective policies toward Pakistan that encourage Islamabad to shut down the Taliban’s sanctuary.

    The world cannot afford to see Afghanistan turn back into a terrorist safe haven like it was under Taliban rule throughout the late 1990s. The first step to avoiding such an end-state is to take off the rose-colored glasses when it comes to Taliban reconciliation and develop hard-headed strategies that change Islamabad’s calculations vis a vis the Taliban.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Take Off Rose-Colored Glasses when it comes to Taliban Reconciliation

    1. Steve S. California says:

      Any policy based on requiring someone to give up their strongly held "religious" beliefs is fatally flawed from the get go. Foreign policy should be realistic and achieveable.. This is anouther policy which will never have the intended effect. When the opposing group sees that you don't even get the basics, you will once again be branded fools, and manipulated at their leisure. There is no up side to this kind of incompetence.

    2. Randall Holland, Ari says:

      Our Campaigner-in-Chief will make a deal with the devil (Taliban) to get out of Afghanistan and save his skin with his liberal base.

    3. Rick says:

      Let's see …

      We're tired of fighting and want to go home.

      That's a position of strength, eh?

      Let's negotiate!

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.