• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Coverdell Education Accounts Are in Danger of Becoming Less Useful


    Coverdell Education Savings Accounts were created in 2001 to provide parents with more options to pay for their children’s elementary, secondary, and college education. Unless Congress quickly takes action, those accounts will no longer be allowed to fund secondary and elementary school expenses.

    President Obama often talks of helping Main Street instead of rewarding Wall Street, and Coverdell accounts are a unique asset for Main Street investors. Parents can squirrel away $2,000 per year per child in Coverdell accounts. They can then invest that money however they like in stocks, bonds, mutual funds, and other investments. The gains are not taxed at all if they use the money on qualified elementary, secondary, or college expenses. These expenses include school supplies like computers and Internet access as well as tuition and room and board at school.

    If Congress fails to act, parents will no longer be able to use the tax-deferred savings for pre-college expenses. That is because the law regarding Coverdell accounts sunsets in 2010, but there is no good reason to let this law expire. Furthermore, the expiration would violate President Obama’s pledge not to raise taxes on people making less than $250,000 a year. As it stands, Coverdell accounts are exempt from capital gains, dividend, and income taxes when used for a child’s education. When the law changes on January 1, 2011, parents will be able to use the money they have saved for many years only on college education.

    The unjust sunset clause also changes the rules for people who don’t want their state governments to manage the money they save for their kids’ college educations in state-run 529 college savings plans. Main Street parents who think they can get a better return investing in the financial markets themselves than what the 529 plans offer could contribute $2,000 per year to Coverdell accounts towards college for each child. In 2011, they will be able to contribute only $500 per student, hardly enough to put a dent in the costs of college education.

    If the law is not extended, the President and Congress will be at odds with those who invested in Coverdells. As it stands now, many children will consequently be subjected to underperforming public schools rather than getting a private religious or non-denominational education. The gains that families have made in these accounts will have to lay dormant until their children are college age. This is unfortunate, since some kids don’t go to college. Let’s hope Congress has a change of heart.

    Posted in Education [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Coverdell Education Accounts Are in Danger of Becoming Less Useful

    1. Billie says:

      Why is he putting road blocks in front of education? Why is education so threatening to him that HE DEMANDS to set the standards?

      Seems to me the president was quick to reward the incompetence of wall street while he distorts or ignores the positive efforts of main street. Seems he is rewarding alot of corrupt, illegal, costly behavior, while burdening with hardship and expense, the decency of the law abiding.

    2. Billie says:

      Speaking of ignorance, headline in today's paper:

      City gets $500k to rethink urban education!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!????????????????

      Under it reads: feds award 'Promise Neighborhood' planning grant to take kids from poverty to prosperity???

      What are parents teaching their children??? What are public schools teaching children???? WHY IS THIS COSTING ADDITIONAL MONEY?????? Wondering how much those that get paid at this pathetic needless ignorance, make?

      This will only enhance racial and cultural achievement gaps because it's bias, discriminative and extremely unconstitutional. If it's so necessary, it's something people can implement using their ideas at no or their costs, without government demeaning their intelligence to impose. Redistribution of wealth is in many forms and government continues to hold some weak while punishing others who hold and see strength…

    3. Steven Peters says:

      Folks, the federal government has no role to play in education, save for the military academies (which we could do without). This article is about ending a tax preference. It would be better to write about reducing taxes for all. Let's focus on shrinking government, not preserving government boons to privileged citizens.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.