• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Civil Rights in the 21st Century

    In the midst of election primaries, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights held a day-long conference yesterday in Washington at the National Press Club titled “A New Era – Defining Civil Rights in the 21st Century.” There was a remarkably wide breadth of speakers, including columnist William Raspberry, Clarence B. Jones (former counsel and speechwriter for Martin Luther King), Roger Clegg (Center for Equal Opportunity), and Heather MacDonald (Manhattan Institute).

    Considering the conference topic — discrimination and racial disparities — the civility and intelligence of the discussions and debates was remarkable. It showcased individuals who have divergent views of how serious a problem we still have with discrimination in this country and what steps we need to take to solve our remaining problems. This is seldom the case in the area of civil rights, where the so-called “traditional” civil rights establishment all too often labels those who disagree with their views as racists. For example, anyone who opposes the type of discrimination represented by racial preferences is automatically condemned as wanting to bring back Jim Crow.

    One of the only exceptions to the civility was a member of the audience who is on the Commission’s Advisory Board in Nebraska. During the Q&A period, he angrily said he was “insulted” by the failure of the speakers to talk about the root of the problem black Americans face: the “fact” that all white people believe “blacks are inferior because of their DNA.”

    What was also amazing was how much almost all of the speakers agreed that the most pressing problem in the black community today is not a lack of legal means to address actual discrimination in employment and other areas. The most pressing problem is a cultural one stemming from the fact that about three out of every four black children are born to single, unwed mothers. There is a complete absence of fathers in black inner urban areas, where gangs substitute for fatherly guidance and discipline, feeding the poverty cycle, dependence on welfare, poor education, and murderous violence. That is the real problem of civil rights in the 21st century — one that government is ill-equipped to handle and that most people do not want to talk about.

    Another interesting note: several of the speakers, including Clarence Jones and Prof. Carol Swain, an African-American law professor at Vanderbilt University, definitely do not share the views of President Obama and other organizations such as the NAACP on illegal immigration. Swain, a very impressive woman who is one of 12 children born to a very poor family in the South, emphasized that not enforcing our laws against illegal immigration hurts the economic prospects of the black community — illegal aliens take jobs from poor citizens (white and black) and non-enforcement rewards immigrants who break the law. She emphasized how important it is that we are a nation based on the rule of law.

    Such sentiments could indeed yield a “new era” in civil rights that is long overdue.

    Posted in Legal [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to Civil Rights in the 21st Century

    1. Brad, Chicago says:

      Although I'm not sure it matters, I wonder what race the Nebraska man is (it would be pretty ridiculous for a white person to say that, implicating himself, but it wouldn't be the first time I'd heard it). If that "fact" were true, there wouldn't be much anyone could do about it. If someone believes such an irrational idea, there simply isn't much, short of the voice of God, Himself, that will change that person's mind. If that were the issue, there is no way to address it. The fact is, white people voted for Barack Obama. Does that mean it was a sympathy vote? I don't think you need any more proof than that to refute the Nebraska man's claim.

      One truth of humanity is that we rank ourselves and other people against each other and prejudices and stereotypes do play a role in that process; I don't think DNA is one of the more common factors, though. Some of the blame for those stereotypes falls on the public representatives of the stereotyped group. Kanye West is a brilliant musical artist, but his public behavior leaves a lot to be desired, even though he makes himself a representative of the black community. Denzel Washington, on the contrary, doesn't have those issues, but I haven't ever heard him talk about being the voice of a generation. Also, misbehavior is far more visible than compliance, so the things we don't like stand out more than the things we do.

    2. Pingback: American Civil Rights Institute Blog

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.