• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Second Gulf Explosion Doesn’t Take Away Need for Drilling

    A production platform caught fire in the Gulf of Mexico this morning 80 miles south of Vermilion Bay, Louisiana. Fortunately, according to early reports, the 13 workers on the platform survived the scare, but rescue crews took the workers to the hospital for precautionary measures.

    What exploded was not a drilling rig (like in the instance of the BP spill) but a production platform. AP reports that the shallow-water platform was not producing oil at the time of the explosion, although the well does normally produce approximately 58,800 gallons of oil and 900,000 cubic feet of gas per day. Although an official for Mariner, the company that operates the rig, reported that no oil is leaking from the platform and they properly shut the well, a thin oil sheen was present. The latest speculation is that the sheen may be from spilled petroleum from the production platform.

    Without a doubt this is a different case than BP’s Macondo well blowout that leaked over 200 million gallons of oil into the water—with BP’s posing a much bigger environmental and economic challenge. If anything, the silver lining from Mariner’s production platform fire is that their response in terms of closing the seven collection wells and evacuation of the 13 crew members seems to have been professionally and successfully carried out.

    Figuring out what caused the fire should be a priority for Mariner and regulators, but this shouldn’t be used as justification for the drilling moratorium. We need to recognize that offshore oil drilling is still an important national and economic priority. Energy is the lifeblood of the American economy, and oil is a significant part of our country’s energy portfolio, and that is unlikely to change any time soon. Offshore drilling provides about one-third of the U.S.’s domestic oil. These much-needed sources off our coastal waters have the potential to provide energy to every aspect of the U.S. economy at a time when fuel shortages that lead to increased energy prices can mean death to struggling industries.

    As rare as these occurrences are, the clear reality is that rig and platform fires that threaten human safety and can cause significant environmental damage cannot keep occurring. We need to transition to a system that promotes safety and allows drilling to continue instead of piling on regulations that make it unnecessarily and prohibitively expensive to drill of America’s coasts. An important part of that effort should be liability reform for the secondary costs that stem from offshore oil and gas accidents.

    The current system places a $75 million cap for the responsible party for these costs. Liability costs above $75 million up to $1 billion are funded by the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund (OSLTF). The OSLTF is financed by an eight-cent-per-barrel tax on imported and domestic oil. The Oil Pollution Act of 1990 stipulates different liability limits for different oil and gas operations.

    This system distorts risk of oil and gas operations in two fundamental ways. The artificially low cap of $75 million established 20 years ago does not fully or directly capture the risk of offshore operations. Secondly, rather than placing responsibility with the liable company, the OSLTF shifts responsibility to the entire industry and, ultimately, the federal government, thereby reducing the incentive for individual companies to operate safely.

    Although the fire on the Mariner production platform was not a result of the liability system, a new system is necessary that better promotes safe offshore drilling operations.

    Congress should reform the OSLTF and remove the $75 million liability cap, replacing it with a new system that accurately assesses the risks of offshore oil and gas operations and appropriately assigns those risks to industry operators. Companies should demonstrate to federal regulators an ability to insure against the liability risk associated with specific offshore oil and gas operations (exploration, extraction, and transportation, etc.) in federal waters. Private risk assessors would determine liability coverage requirements for specific activities, and federal regulators would certify that liability requirements are met. The means for meeting liability coverage requirements would not be limited but may include self-insurance, insurance pools, dedicated assets, or private insurance policies.

    The federal government would create a private, tiered insurance framework and administrative process to manage claims. The central element of the insurance framework would be a private and voluntary pooled insurance fund for claims above $1 billion. The claims process would ensure that legitimate claims are paid fully and efficiently while protecting responsible parties from frivolous lawsuits. This is a system that would better align risk and behavior and enhance the safety of America’s offshore oil and gas operations.

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    8 Responses to Second Gulf Explosion Doesn’t Take Away Need for Drilling

    1. adam christian, dall says:

      Glenn Beck is a muslim.

    2. CommonSense Arvada, says:

      "As rare as these occurrences are…"

      The author needs to do a bit of research, these incidents are not rare at all. If he had checked the MMS stats, he would have seen that there were 858 explosions or fires between 2001 and 2010, that's about 95 a year. Hardly a rare occurrence.

      It's dangerous work and we have to accept the risks.

    3. Dave, Raleigh NC says:

      No, the Federal Government shouldn't have anything to do with private business period. Come on people this is getting ridiculous. Should the fed tell us when to use the bathroom too? Let the fed create fines for such things, and let a private organization create an insurance for these people.

    4. Lloyd Scallan (New O says:

      One major difference between the two is this fire occured on a production platform (and not a drilling rig) that is not operated by BP, who wrote part of Obama's Cap and Trade bill. Does anyone find it "convenient" that a blow-out on a drilling rig or a fire on a production platform has not occured in years. Yet now, within 4 months, there was one of each. One prompted Obama drilling band. The other occured just in time to reinforce the band before the courts ruled against the band. After we all have witnessed what Obama is capable of in order to shove his agenda down our throats, is it a far stretch to, just for a moment, wonder why this is happening now?

    5. Spiritof76, NH says:

      The federal government is the problem. The reason for all these offshore sites is the stupidity of the givernment to shut down safer operatine wells on land. The Western US contains enough economically extractable oil to move us way from deep water drilling. The government distorted the risk by shutting down the low risk production.

      As Ronald Reagan said, "The government is the problem". Defund the Dept. of energy and defund the EPA. and MMS. They are all largely useless entities wasting our tax dollars.

    6. Leon Lundquist, Dura says:

      Lloyd, that is precise and to the point. These "accidents" are suspicious by their timing alone. I concluded that the odds are millions to one that the Deepwater Horizon disaster was accidental. Governmental oversight is more likely to produce disaster than it is to reduce these potentials. Let's not forget that BP is most accident prone Oil Company who got special rights of "self inspection" by Obama's appointees. It appears the Gulf Oil Spill was indeed a man caused disaster, the motives for it were Political. Gee! Lookie here! Another timely crisis for the Administration to exploit. But in their exploitation American Interests are being thwarted in favor of the Progressive "Destroy America" Agenda. Kill Oil Industry is the evil intention of Obama and his gang. You can't see any benefit for America in anything Obama does. Treason, period.

    7. Bobbie says:

      Because I'm so intelligent I came up with this awesome idea. Let's not use our time and other peoples money to fix the problem and admit mankind makes mistakes, lets just say, NO MORE DRILLING! and lets just create more crisis' That way I can use my intelligence to take away yours…

      Governor Bobby Jindal Sir, please don't let this man or his administration, intimidate you from dong the right thing…

    8. Harry Snyder Tempera says:

      Most of Obama's policies seem to be deliberately pushing us toward rationing of fuel and other commodities. Regulation upon regulation to limit production and distribution of vital petroleum products, note the refusal to allow construction of the Canadian pipeline to Texas. A radio commercial assures us that Canada can supply us with even more of their oil, if there is a pipeline to deliver it to our refineries.

      It is perhaps quite instructive that Obama told us in 2009 that our ability to drive our SUV's and set out house furnaces at 72 (although the Obamas eat quite well and take frequent vacations and it seems that I remember him saying the WH would have a 78 degree temperature in winter).

      We could end up like a "banana republic" with a wealthy ruling class, a huge poverty class and a shrunken middle class, with Obama and his successors being quasi-monarchs. But wait 'til 2012…………

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×