• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Don't Reward Russia's Iranian Complicity With New Start

    The New Strategic Arms Reductions Treaty (New START) has been in the news for over a year now. First there were the negotiations with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev in the fall of 2009. Then President Obama signed the new treaty with president Medvedev in April 2010. Now the Senate Foreign Relations Committee has two options: put the treaty up for a vote and send it to the Senate or acquiesce to a GOP request to release the negotiating record to the committee.

    Before the Senate decides they should first consider whether this agreement is really going to change Russian behavior. It’s not. In fact it’s more of business as usual. Despite the Obama administration’s efforts to improve Russia-U.S. relations ,Russia has continued its push to regain lost influence in its near abroad.  A new nuclear arms reductions treaty is not going to end Russia’s historical desire for neighbors that are not just friendly but supplicant.

    Let’s start with Israel’s concern about Iranian nuclear capabilities. There has been enough speculation on if and when Israel will strike Iran’s nuclear infrastructure to fill several volumes on the subject. Scholars have given us a glimpse into what an Israeli strike and Iranian response would look like partly because an Israeli strike would not be unprecedented.  In 1981 Israeli warplanes struck an Iraqi reactor at Osirak in Iraq and in 2007 Israel bombed a reactor in Syria.

    Despite these past successes an Israeli strike on Iranian nuclear facilities has been made more difficult by the addition of Russian S-300s in the Georgian breakaway territory of Abkhazia. While totally Ignoring U.S. requests for a peaceful solution to the 2008 war Russia has been a powerful ally of Abkhazia.

    The addition of the S-300s limits any strike on Iran from the north, giving Israel fewer good options should it choose to strike the core of Iran’s nuclear program at Natanz, Qom, Esfahan and Bushehr. Furthermore, S-300s are overkill for the types of “warplanes, missiles or drones” that Russia and Abkhazia would face from the Georgian military.  Installing S-300s are like using a sledgehammer to kill a fly. The only reason to install them in Abkhazia is to limit the options for a military strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities. The installation of Russian S-300 battery was installed after negotiations on New START began and have continued despite the treaty signing in April. So much for a reset.

    The reasons that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon have been thoroughly documented. This move shows that Russia is more concerned with maintaining ties with its trading partner than really resetting relations with the U.S. This brings us to the next point. Why is Russia obstructing an Israeli military strike of Iran’s nuclear sites?

    Money. The answer is found in trade, military hardware, gasoline, minerals and hydrocarbons. Despite the domestic problems that Iran is facing a shocking 20% of Iran’s overall imports were for its nuclear reactor program and Russia has been more than willing to supply them with technology and refined gasoline. While the U.S. is urging the international community to be tough with Iran, Russian has resumed gasoline sales into Iran. Russia is also selling Iran nuclear and missile technology which will only accelerate their push toward nuclear capability.

    In all the back-and-forth about New START we should never lose sight of the realities we are faced with.  Russia can’t always count on its petrodollars and Iran has said it wants to assume a hegemonic control over the Middle East and Central Asia. This means that each is going to find ways to make money and have influence. To that end, Russia and Iran have decided to collaborate in order to counter U.S. and international interests. It is irresponsible for any country to allow Iran to become a nuclear state. Worse still would be a country that actively helps Iran as it lurches on with its nuclear program.  Russia is complicit on both counts. The New START should not be seen as a reset of U.S.-Russian relations. It is another stumbling block which will only give the impression that things have changed. In reality, it’s business as usual.

    Philip Reboli is an intern with Heritage Action for America.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Don't Reward Russia's Iranian Complicity With New Start

    1. Brian Wilson in Pitt says:

      While everyone is talking about the NYC mosque Obama is quietly letting Iran become nuclear!
      When will the American people step up about Iran becoming a nuclear power? When will the media begin the discussion?
      This is a Berlin blockade moment or a Cuban Missile Crisis and we are sitting it out!!!
      In sports they say that you lose if you play to tie. Obama has indicated that he doesn't want the US to stand out, but to be equal with many other counties. He is playing for a tie, for a loss!
      This is very dangerous in the economic world but even more so in the nuclear and terrorist worlds.
      He has not proven that he can influence a single country yet he is comfortable with Russia, Iran, Korea, Venezuela, and multiple Middle Eastern and Islamic countries banding together against us and having nuclear weapons.
      It should not have come this far but it is time to act! We need to aid Israel's attack and join in with our own before the rods go into the reactors. We need to employ bunker bombs and every thing we have. We need to hit the same spot over and over until the bunkers are destroyed.
      We need to be prepared for Terrorists to strike back and maybe even Russia or Korea, but we must act now the risks are rising exponentially if we do not. It will become harder not easier to act.
      This is different than The Cold War. The Soviets were not using terrorist tactics. Bombing civilians inside our country was not an issue. The bombs of that day did not fit in a suitcase or under a burka. Our border was not out of control.
      Wake up AMERICA and turn from political correctness to common sense.

    2. S says:

      Air strike against Iran is just a bluff. Iran is so powerful. No country can attack Iran.

    3. Glenn says:

      Wake up America? Brian, what about Iraq? Did you find nuclear bombs there? NO! What happened? More than 1 million people died. Where is democracy in Iraq?

      Yes, Americans should wake up. But not for a new crime.

      By the way, how many nuclear weapons in Israel? Wake up America!

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×