• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Another Green Jobs Debacle from Obama's Failed Stimulus

    The New York Times reports today that only 8.4% of the $3.2 billion Congress included in President Barack Obama’s failed stimulus to create green jobs by improving energy efficiency has been spent through July. From the NYT:

    The program was to provide money for the purchase of better lighting or heating and cooling equipment for buildings like city halls and schools. But it is off to the same slow start as a bigger program that was initiated at the same time to weatherize the homes of low-income people around the country. An audit of that program in February, also by the inspector general, found that only $368.2 million of $4.73 billion, or less than 8 percent, had been spent.

    The problems Mr. Friedman cited are similar to the ones reported with the weatherization grants: when Congress approved the program … federal money comes with strings attached.

    The strings on the weatherization program were rules like one requiring that people spending federal dollars pay the “prevailing wage.” The government had no established number for the prevailing wage for fields like insulation installers.

    In the block grant program, the strings are different but just as cumbersome; for example, if a building is landmarked as historic, any physical changes require multiple approvals. And some work requires an environmental impact statement.

    So first the left’s big labor allies hamstrung the stimulus with job killing Davis-Bacon rules, and now the left’s environmental allies have thwarted the stimulus with their priorities. We warned this would happen. Back in February before the stimulus was passed we warned:

    Normally it takes a federal construction projects an average of 4.4 years to complete a NEPA review. Throw in the Clean Water Act’s section 404 requirements, and before a single shovel can hit the earth it usually takes 5.6 years for the average federal project to jump through all the normal environmental hoops. Since environmentalists killed any chance of regulatory reform, the billions in infrastructure spending in this stimulus bill will not be spent till years after the economy has already recovered.

    Posted in Economics [slideshow_deploy]

    One Response to Another Green Jobs Debacle from Obama's Failed Stimulus

    1. Don Mitchel says:

      COST are what decide where manufacturing takes place.

      If our President would direct the Senate to work out the state rights concerns of Senator Boxer over national ballast water legislation that she killed in 2008, according to a 2009 report for congress the COST of foreign imports would rise. Our states would not have to compete with an international organization over the COST to keep our waters clean. Unfortunately our president has taken the position that our waters should be governed by a military plan to last 20 plus years starting with another 14 month study coinciding with the Coast Guard plan to mirror the IMO for the first decade. As the report for congress suggesting imports COST would rise with American legislation that would affect mostly foreign ships the Presidents plan clearly shows a theme to continue our countries policy of economic globalization over economic Americanization or our environment by keeping foreign shipping COST low.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×