• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • National Education Standards: Still Not a Conservative Idea

    “The Common Core Curriculum: National Education Standards Even Conservatives Can Love.” This is what Chester Finn and Michael Petrilli of the Fordham Institute write about the Obama Administration’s push to implement national standards in classrooms across the nation.

    In reality, there is nothing conservative about national standards, which will further tie schools to the demands of Washington bureaucrats but do little to improve student achievement. National standards create a one-size-fits-all, centralized approach to education. And while proponents will say that these standards are “voluntary,” the significant amount of federal funding that would be tied to their adoption makes them anything but.

    How is it conservative to increase Washington’s control in an area in which the Constitution gives no federal authority? And since when did conservative principles include empowering bureaucrats by taking control from parents? As the federal government’s influence grows, states will have to cater to Washington’s plans for students. Similarly, parents will lose one of their most important tools in overseeing their children’s education: control over the academic content and standards taught in schools. Instead of engaging at the local level, parents would be forced to lobby Washington.

    Finn and Petrilli claim that “the new standards were created by a voluntary partnership of 48 states, not by the federal government.”

    But in the same piece they acknowledge: “A number of states signed on to the Common Core standards at least in part to boost their chances of getting federal education dollars from [Education Secretary Arne] Duncan’s ‘Race to the Top’ competition.”

    In addition to Race to the Top, the Obama Administration wants to require states to adopt the standards in order to be eligible for Title I money for low-income schools.

    The authors admit that “there are risks inherent in a national anything, particularly if the federal government clumsily tries to intervene.”

    We’ve taken enough risks with nationalization in America lately: banking, the automobile industry, and health care. Now the federal government wants to take control of education. Increasing federal power has not improved education in the past half century. Why would this boost to federal power be any different?

    Instead of giving greater power to the federal government, school reform should provide greater transparency and accountability to parents, not federal bureaucrats. The information that parents need to determine if their children are succeeding is already available through state tests and the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Furthermore, parents should have the opportunity to send children to their school of choice. That’s the kind of accountability that would really spur schools to improve.

    Unlike national standards that come with federal strings attached, these reforms would empower parents, respect federalism, and keep Washington out of the classroom. These are ideas that conservatives really can love.

    Co-authored by Lindsey Burke.

    Posted in Education [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to National Education Standards: Still Not a Conservative Idea

    1. Scott Spinella says:

      Nice post.Thanks for sharing your post with us.I felt really good after reading it.

    2. Pingback: Tips To Choose Your New Yellow Diamond Earrings « Handcrafted Jewellery

    3. John Webb says:

      Too late, the progressives have been running our schools and cranking out little Michael Moore’s by the thousands every year for quite some time now. And if it is not brought under control it will reach a critical point where it cannot be reversed, if it hasn’t already.

    4. Pingback: ADF Alliance Alert » National education standards: Still not a conservative idea

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.