• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Enough Leftist Apologizing, Let the New Black Panther Party Attorneys Testify

    E.J. Dionne Jr. does not want to talk about the facts of the New Black Panther Party case. In his column today he dismisses the issue “right-wing propaganda” while blithely repeating blatant falsehoods. The American Spectator‘s Quin Hillyer called Dionne out this morning:

    He writes: “This is a story about a tiny group of crackpots who stopped no one from voting.” WRONG. Does Dionne ever actually do his own research and read documents? Two different people, both of them highly credible witnesses, including civil rights legend Bartle Bull, swore under oath that they each saw three people literally turn around and leave without voting after seeing the Panthers.

    You can read Bull’s testimony, and other evidence of actual voters being actually intimidated, here. Hillyer goes on to tackle some of the other statements Dionne made about U.S. Commission on Civil Rights member Abigail Thernstrom:

    Dionne reports Abigail Thernstrom’s charge that the other Civil Rights Commissioners are motivated simply by wanting to “topple” the Obama administration. But he doesn’t mention that each of the five has denied the charge vociferously, nor does he explain why their motivation has anything to do with what the actual facts are, nor does he ask why Thernstrom spent six solid months claiming that the case indeed was “blatant voter intimidation.” Thernstrom herself acknowledged in April that at least three voters “were intimidated…I mean I take seriously when anybody is intimidated, and I’m not dismissing that experience of theirs…but nevertheless, it seems to me the case of the New Black Panther Party actually blocking people from voting would be stronger if there were more than three people that we’re talking about here.” In other words, she admitted voter intimidation, but just argued that there weren’t MANY people who were intimidated.

    You can read Thernstrom’s prior admission that voters were intimated, here. And National Review’s Andy McCarthy has a more thorough discussion of Thernstrom’s role here.

    As bad as Dionne may wish this story would disappear, that simply is not going to happen until the Obama administration starts being more transparent and stops stonewalling Congress and the Commission by not allowing those involved to testify openly. Heritage fellow Hans von Spakovsky reported Friday:

    I just learned from a congressional source that all seven GOP members of the Senate Judiciary Committee — Jeff Sessions, Orrin Hatch, Charles Grassley, Jon Kyl, Lindsey Graham, John Cornyn, and Tom Coburn — sent a letter to Judiciary Committee chairman Patrick Leahy demanding an oversight hearing of the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ to investigate the dismissal of this case and the allegations of racialist enforcement of the civil-rights laws (PDF of the letter here). The senators cited sworn testimony before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights that Deputy Assistant Attorney General Julie Fernandes instructed Division attorneys that they would not pursue cases against black defendants and that the DOJ has no interest in enforcing Section 8of the National Voter Registration Act.

    Dionne finishes his article today by writing: “If Obama hates the current media climate, he should stop overreacting to it. And the mainstream media should stop being afraid of insisting on the difference between news and propaganda.” This is a great idea. Enough propaganda from the Obama DoJ apologists. What is the real story behind the dismissal of the New Black Panther Party case.

    Posted in Legal [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Enough Leftist Apologizing, Let the New Black Panther Party Attorneys Testify

    1. Billie says:

      Can't stand hypothetical words contrary to known facts. Especially with public knowledge of these panthers and Louie's love of hatred, violence and deadly threats against men of a skin color they had no choice in. Isn't that a bit childish?

      Follow the truth and teachings of Jesus Christ and you will grow to be real men and gain the ability to get along with everyone.

      Lives are threatened and this unnecessary defiance in this writing is dangerously ignorant. Incompetent, misleading and undeserving of his job.

      How obvious unequal rights have come to be.

    2. Pingback: Virginia Right! News Hound for 7/27/2010 | Virginia Right!

    3. Lloyd Scallan (New O says:

      Is anyone that naive to believe Obama and/or his administration will suddenly become "transparent" or stop "stonewalling"? With 91% of black voters still

      support Obama agenda, it would be foolish to upset that voting block by exposing the truth when lying and deception makes better political sense? Does Dionne actually believe the left-wing media is "afraid" of anything BUT the truth?

    4. Drew Page, IL says:

      If it were ever possible to give Barack Obama the benefit of the doubt as to his motives, that day is gone. His absolute silence, with respect to the charges made against the Department of Justice in general and Deputy Asst. Attorney General Julie Fernandes in particular, has been deafening.

      Mr. J. Christian Adams in sworn testimony before the Civil Rights Commissions told the story of Ms. Fernandes instructing attorneys at the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice (?) to refrain from prosecuting black on white voter intimidation. Mr. Adams testified that his former direct superior at DOJ was aware of Ms. Fernandes' instructions and would corroborate his testimony.

      The Civil Rights Commission wanted to subpoena testimony of Ms. Fernandes and of Mr. Adams former direct boss at DOJ. But in order to do so, the DOJ had to authorize the Commission to issue those subpoenas. So what was the DOJ's response to the request to issue those subpoenas? A refusal. A refusal.

      No further comment from Attorney General Holder, or from his boss, President Obama. I thought no one was supposed to be above the law.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.