• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Chávez, FARC, and Colombia: Decision Time for the Obama Administration

    On July 22, Colombia’s Ambassador to the Organization of American States (OAS) presented evidence of what is clearly a credible report on the presence of camps of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) inside Venezuela. By official U.S. designation FARC is a terrorist organization, one of three operating in Colombia.

    The OAS summary tells the story best:

    The Colombian Ambassador presented “a series of photographs, maps, coordinates, and videos that, according to his government, represent proof of the presence of illegal armed groups in Venezuelan territory. [Note: The OAS does not consider FARC a terrorist organization.]

    He “made a series of requests, including the formation of an International Committee with all willing OAS Member States to visit within the next 30 days the places where Colombia alleges the presence of the members of FARC present in their neighboring country.”

    Venezuela’s Representative “denied the validity of the evidence presented by the Colombian representative, questioned the accusations and disapproved of the use of the OAS as a platform for presenting them.”  He then “announced the rupture of bilateral relations between his country and Colombia as a result of the meeting, and reiterated his criticism to the Colombian government for convening the meeting.”

    By taking its concerns to the OAS, Colombia acted correctly. Its use of the OAS route stands in contrast to its March 1, 2008 response, which preemptively killed FARC chief-of-staff Raul Reyes with a strike on a camp just inside Ecuador. This time Colombia took its concerns to the OAS to demand collective action and support against the serious threat of terrorism and subversion, aided and abetted by Chávez’s Venezuela. Chávez’s response to a legitimate concern was to break diplomatic relations.

    The Obama Administration repeatedly says it wants to strengthen multilateralism and security in the Americas. Yet, when critical issues arise within the OAS and action is needed, the OAS becomes mired in collective inaction, torn between the followers of the Chavista line and the rest of the herd.

    Colombia’s call for an International Committee merits a serious response. The Obama Administration must first make a decision: Is the evidence Colombia presented credible? Can our massive intelligence network pronounce on the allegations? If they can, they should say so—publicly. If they cannot, it is a serious indication of deficiencies in our capacity to monitor adverse activities in the region.

    If the Colombia case is solid, which many believe it is, then the Obama Administration must work with other nations to form an international committee to investigate the allegations.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to Chávez, FARC, and Colombia: Decision Time for the Obama Administration

    1. Danny, FL says:

      Obama will not do or say anything like usual. He lacks the balls to take any aggresive action until it's too late. I'm sure he's been warned about that lunatic Chavez time and again. Chavez is a HUGE national security threat and yet you don't hear a peep out of Obama. Believing in what he said during his campaign and voting for him was a big mistake on my part. Never again!

    2. Tony, FL says:

      Something has to be done with this mistake of evolution soon, before it's too late. His actions have gotten out of hand and he's become a serious threat to US national security, (i.e., making arms deals with other lunatic dictators like himself, stealing US owned oil rigs, harboring/supporting terrorists, etc). Obama better step up to the plate and show some backbone now before chavez does anymore damage.

    3. france says:

      the problem in any attempt that washington has becomes irrelevant, simply because of its own position. therefore washington cannot be trusted, the iraq war, the golf of tonkin, perl harbor , you named, washington is an expert in deceiving democracy, reason why superpowers are corrupt, all of them, china, russia, britain when it was one, spain, france. unfortunately is something humans have not found a solution. reason why wars exist and economical crisis as well as inequalities. but humans will evolve I hope or else they will perish.

    4. Darwin Canada says:

      Its not that simple. If the FARC are terrorists, then Venezuela is harbouring criminals. If FARC is not, meaning they are belligerent forces with legitimate political aims, then Venezuela could provide "safe harbour". So what are they.

    5. Pingback: Why Give A Gift When You Can Give Several?

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.