• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Only in D.C. Does Cheating Not Matter

    The Senate Armed Services Committee held a hearing on Tuesday on the implementation of the New START Treaty. Two weeks ago, Sen. John Kerry (D–MA) wrote in an op-ed that given all the testimony there was a clear record in favor of treaty ratification. However, had Sen. Kerry waited for the statements of The Honorable James Miller, Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, and General Kevin P. Chilton, Commander, U.S. Strategic Command, he may have been a little more hesitant to make such a proclamation.

    Dr. Miller and General Chilton each asserted that there is no reason to worry about Russia cheating under the New START Treaty given that it will have no overall effect on U.S. security. These statements drew the wrath of Sen. John McCain (R–AZ), who retorted, “I always believed in all the treaties that I’ve been involved in, in the past 28 years, General, that cheating does matter and it does have an effect. And to say that it has little, if any, effect, then we’ve been wasting a lot of time and money on negotiations.” Even more bluntly, Sen. McCain asked, “Why have a treaty?”

    This is the question many have been asking all along.

    Russia’s cheating on treaties is certainly nothing new. In 1991 Russia admitted to building a large anti-ballistic missile, which was clearly in violation of the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty. The 2005 report from the Bureau of Verification, Compliance, and Implementation revealed a number of Russian violations under START I, which expired at the end of last year. Just last week, the State Department released its latest rounds of compliance documents to Congress. Paula DeSutter, former Assistant Secretary of State for Verification, Compliance, and Implementation from 2002 to 2009, stated that the reports, when made public, will show Moscow remains “in noncompliance on a whole range of START treaty issues.” To blithely ignore the likely possibility that Russia will cheat on the new treaty is nothing short of frightening.

    President Obama has signed a treaty with a weak verification regime and preamble language that can potentially limit U.S. missile defense. As noted by Robert G. Joseph, former State Department Under Secretary for Arms Control, “‘Trust but verify’ has been the standard [on treaties with Russia] for more than 20 years. Whether the new START treaty meets this standard is a major issue.” Our national security is on the line.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.