• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Federal Wind Insurance Is Still a Huge Mistake

    Like the monster in a third-rate horror movie that seems to be destroyed but comes back again and again, some bad ideas in Washington keep popping up. Adding wind insurance coverage to the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), a program that already needs to be bailed out every few years, is one of those irresponsible policy mistakes that legislators continue to push well after it should have been declared dead and buried. Its latest incarnation, H.R. 1264, the Multiple Peril Insurance Act, introduced by Representative Gene Taylor (D–MS), contains all of the mistakes of earlier versions.

    As we wrote back in July 2008:

    Expanding the NFIP in any way is fiscally irresponsible. Some believe if coverage against wind-caused damage is provided at unsubsidized rates, the revenue brought in would cover the real cost of providing the insurance. But a study by Towers Perrin reveals that the proposed wind insurance program would actually run regular operational deficits. Even if Congress forgives the amount that the NFIP already owes, increasing its costs by running additional deficits is a step in the wrong direction.

    Affordable wind insurance is readily available through many private sector companies. There is no need to replace these providers with a public-sector program that is already in trouble and has no expertise in administering a wind insurance program. As the experience of states such as Florida has shown, once politics are involved, it becomes very difficult to set premiums in a way that accurately reflects the costs of potential losses. Instead, politicians tend to influence the program to set unrealistically lower premiums to keep their constituents happy and worry about the potential liability only much later.

    Those facts are just as true now as they were two years ago. The NFIP can just barely manage to provide the flood insurance coverage that has been its mandate for the last 30 years, and there are no signs that it can—or should—try to push the private sector out of a product that insurance companies have offered for decades at affordable rates. Adding wind coverage to the NFIP would be irresponsible and just force taxpayers to subsidize yet another policy failure.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to Federal Wind Insurance Is Still a Huge Mistake

    1. Pingback: Federal Wind Insurance Is Still a Huge Mistake | The Foundry … | Other Insurance | Save money right here!

    2. Pingback: Federal Wind Insurance Is Still a Huge Mistake | The Foundry … « blog01 – new life.

    3. Pingback: Good News | News Blog and Forum

    4. Drew Page, IL says:

      Private insurance is already available for wind damage. What's the matter with these Democrats, don't they have enough other places to waste our tax money?

    5. Pingback: Good News | Current News

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.