• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Will Congress Pull the Plug on C-17’s Life Support?

    C-17 Jet

    Having canceled nearly 50 major programs in last year’s defense budget, the secretary of defense is making another run at finishing off the C-17 and Joint Strike Fighter alternate engine. Congress spared these programs last year, but may be willing to go along with Secretary Gates this time around.

    Certainly President Obama has changed his tune. During the presidential campaign, he singled out the C-17 as a must-have priority, saying America needed it to “preserve global reach in the air.” Now, however, the Pentagon says it has enough “lift” without it. Odd, considering that the Army and Marine Corps are still adding personnel.

    It’s simple math: To move more extra troops (and their heavy gear, including Abrams tanks and Apache helicopters), you need extra lift to get them to places like Haiti, Chile, and Afghanistan. And that lift can be handy on the home front too: witness the welcome service of the C-17s that recently provided support to those devastated by the Gulf Coast oil spill.

    The C-17 is the last remaining military wide-bodied cargo production line in America. What happens when we need those highly-skilled engineers and designers in the future? It’s a serious question, yet the administration’s response is a bland and unsupported assurance that, if we need ’em, we’ll surely be able to find ’em somewhere in the private sector.

    That assertion defies logic. The last U.S. bomber-production facility is now home to a Walmart. Once closed, these facilities and their talented workforce will disperse and disappear. Even if Humpty Dumpty could be put back together again, the cost of restarting a shut-down C-17 line is estimated at $5.7 billion, hardly a savings for the Defense Department in the long-run.

    Finally, the U.S. needs more C-17s due to sheer attrition. In times of war, military equipment wears out five to six times faster than in peacetime, and the C-17s have been getting a heavy workout for eight straight years. The current fleet will have to be retired from service much faster than planned. Many will reach the end of their programmed service lives in just twelve years.

    It takes two years lead time to order supplies for aircraft assembly. A lapse in production would create a serious capability gap — and wind up costing taxpayers more in the long run. Congress should tell the Pentagon to place its C-17 replacement orders now, as part of the 2011 defense budget. Indeed, it should be ordering additional C-17s just to keep up with readily foreseeable demand.

    Cross-posted at The Corner.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Will Congress Pull the Plug on C-17’s Life Support?

    1. Shannan Hearne, Clov says:

      I think average citizens have finally had enough. I am forming a movement of small business owners and work at home moms who are sick and tired of big government stomping out small business. http://www.AmericanWAHM.com http://www.FaceBook.com/AmericanWAHM http://www.Twitter.com/AmericanWAHM

    2. West Texan says:

      Thank you Mackenzie for sharing this disturbing but not surprising news. While Gates cuts deeper into defense budgets, Obama recklessly spends trillions on domestic social services outside the federal's authority. Obama's priorities are so backward it defies basic constitutional limits and managerial logic. Gates needs to follow the professional advice of his joint chiefs while ignoring the community organizer in chief he calls boss.

    3. Pingback: Will Congress Pull the Plug on C-17’s Life Support? | Plug The Bleeping Hole

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×