• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Tackling the Challenges of the Broadcasting Board of Governors

    The new Broadcasting Board of Governors, announced on Friday by the Obama White House, have their work cut out for them. For a variety of not very satisfactory reasons, the U.S. broadcasting entities (Voice of America, Radio Free Europe, et al.) on whom the federal government spends $745 million a year of the taxpayers’ hard-earned money, have been without strong leadership and management for an unconscionably long period.

    Members of the board whose terms have long since expired have been doing yeoman service holding down the fort at the BBG since before President Obama took office. Yet, the assertive institutional leadership needed to face 21st century challenges has been absent. In fact, wrote Sen. Richard Lugar (R–IN) recently in The Huffington Post, “The BBG has been at full strength for only six of the past 15 years. The average seat is vacant for 460 days, and one seat has been empty for more than four years.” As an institution, it has often been a political football as Congress continues to seek some way of exerting oversight over U.S. international broadcasting.

    The fact is that the war of information and ideas did not end with the victory over communism in the Cold War. Not only is the challenge today coming from violent, extreme Islamism, but also from state actors like China and Russia, both of whom have honed in on the elements of “soft power” critical to their international ambitions and are now investing major resources in mass media. In Latin America, not just Cuba, but also autocratic rulers like Hugo Chavez are tightening the grip on the free flow of information, making U.S. efforts to reach their populations with accurate news as important as ever. And against this background looms several pending decisions regarding the strategic allocation of resources: Radio versus television, traditional media versus Internet and new media, mass appeal versus the targeting of elites and dissidents.

    The eight individuals, four nominated by Democrats and four by Republicans, charged with providing this leadership, were stuck for months in congressional limbo awaiting confirmation as Sen. Tom Coburn (R–OK) demanded a thorough vetting of the group for their qualifications and views on broadcasting. On Friday, however, the White House finally made the announcement of their appointment. With Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy Judith McHale being the ninth member of the Board, the membership now consists of:

    • Chairman Walter Isaacson, President of the Aspen Institute, former Chairman and CEO of CNN and former Editor of Time Magazine;
    • Victor H. Ashe, who recently served as U.S. Ambassador to Poland;
    • Michael Lynton, Chairman and CEO of Sony Pictures Entertainment;
    • Susan McCue, former Chief of Staff to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid;
    • Michael P. Meehan, President of Blue Line Strategic Communications;
    • Dana Perino, former White House Press Secretary to President George W. Bush; and
    • S. Enders Wimbush, Senior Vice President at the Hudson Institute and from 1987–93 and former Director of Radio Liberty in Munich, Germany.

    The board’s newest members are now entering a world where tensions run high and opinions are anything but lacking. At a recent Heritage Foundation forum, “Perspectives on U.S. International Broadcasting,” some of the biggest voices in public diplomacy aired sharply diverging views on the effectiveness of the BBG as an institution. Jim Glassman, former Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs, provided analysis and support for the Broadcasting Board of Governors’ role and mission. Ambassador Tom Korologos, another panelist had a clear message for critics of the BBG: “Lay off!” While admitting that the BBG does have some problems, he encouraged the audience to “keep this in perspective.” The BBG broadcasts in 60 languages, over 100 countries, and has 3,500 employees.

    Meanwhile, Robert Reilly, Senior Fellow for Strategic Communications at the American Foreign Policy Council and former Director of Voice of America told a different story of a very dysfunctional institution.  Oftentimes governors let politics and self-interest distract from good management and proper priorities.  This is compounded by the fact that personnel issues and journalistic short-comings often end up inflaming tempers on Capitol Hill. According to Josh Carter, Legislative Director for Senator Brownback (R–KS), the BBG’s budget has “exploded,” from $425 million to $745 million in the past few years. The BBG takes up 40 percent of the U.S. Government’s public diplomacy budget. Yet, because the BBG is by statute meant to be a firewall guaranteeing editorial independence from political influence, Congress feels deprived of proper oversight mechanisms. Tim Shamble, President of the American Federation of Government Employees of Local 1812 chapter, stressed that personnel morale has plummeted as radio is being downgraded in favor of other media.

    With the host of issues that demand attention, the new BBG will have its hands full. Most important of all, however, is that the board has a global strategy and a passionate commitment to the free flow of information and ideas. That remains one of the most potent foreign policy tools we have.

    Co-authored by Morgan Roach.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Tackling the Challenges of the Broadcasting Board of Governors

    1. WHICH WAY says:

      God help us if obama controls our world image. Do i need say more?

    2. The Federalist says:

      US international broadcasting is becoming increasingly marginalized. There are a variety of reasons for this.

      At the top of the list is poor decision making by the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG), some of its own doing. One should also include bad advice from senior bureaucrats of the International Broadcasting Bureau (IBB), including a seriously flawed “strategic plan.”

      In addition, the agency has never adjusted well to a post-Cold War era in which credible information is competing not only with legitimate broadcasting entities but also with a seemingly insatiable reservoir of misinformation and disinformation. People have choices, including what they choose to believe or disbelieve from official sources.

      One of the most glaring BBG sins of commission and omission is the decision to terminate direct Voice of America (VOA) broadcasts to Russia and by extension the former Soviet republics in which Russian is spoken as a second language. This decision was put into effect two weeks before the Russians invaded the Republic of Georgia in 2008. It remains in effect to this day. Russia is not an open and free media environment. Russian interests are not always US interests, even though they often intersect with one another. Finally, the Russians have a substantial international media operation, including international radio and television broadcasting and those supplements we often see included in the Washington Post. That’s what the Russians are doing, while we are practicing the “sound of silence.”

      US international broadcasting is on that slippery slope in which it is put in the context of an afterthought, regardless of whatever ceremony is put into swearing in a new Board of Governors. Americans are confronted with many serious domestic issues that affect their daily lives. US international broadcasting is an “inside the Beltway” exercise that has little or completely no meaning to the majority of Americans worried about the economy, their mortgages, employment and health care, to name a few daily priorities. The multi-million dollar “life support” funding for US international broadcasting is an inviting target when Federal budget cuts are eyed and funding priorities are reordered. Everyone inside the Cohen Building needs to keep that in mind.

      Finally, there is the Human Capital Survey. The officials of the BBG/IBB and senior VOA management have a jaundiced view toward agency employees. These results of the survey demonstrate that a hostile work environment has become institutionalized. The agency has never been off the bottom rankings of this survey since it began. Senior agency officials are unconcerned with the results, give tepid lip service to “communicating” with employees and all the while maintaining a fundamental “business as usual” attitude.

      If US international broadcasting has any redeeming value to US interests, the BBG/IBB should be terminated and the functions and employees of VOA and other entities transferred elsewhere in the Federal government that are better suited to effective management of these operations.

    3. CXCatarina95 says:

      When searching for an outdoor discounted, always come to a decision before one more season commences. The majority of sites usually go on a tremendous selling as the spring will come because completely new are being released in the . It's not easy to find low-priced pieces of Commercial Manila this means you will expense of your time and efforts. Yet, owning a residence suggests anything in order to mostly anyone so we are unable to only be put off by Commercial Properties in Manila. In addition make certain that anything paint which was utilized on the Altaland Realty is 100% lead-free. When a person's tot grows very large to get his , it will likely be time for you to start off shopping for the child's . Nevertheless, also investing in a toddler really should be checked out regarding standards rather than look plus could.

      A persons tastes may differ. One particular item of could possibly be old-fashioned nonetheless could suit a person's preferences to get his or her . Thus, acquiring successful to discover the brains behind fits a person's is definitely unavoidable. The first thing it is best to always remember will be the quantity of security the particular supplies. You ought to stay clear of everything made of lightweight or maybe free just like ladders and security track with . Some people's preference may differ. A person part of could possibly be old-fashioned yet may possibly accommodate somebody's style regarding their . Consequently, receiving blessed to discover the one which matches ones is definitely inevitable.

      Your second conditions once for all young children can be it to be produced from robust areas. You are aware how boisterous ones becomes with engage in, this means you will need that might stay longer when compared to a couple of months. A few products which usually you should look at usually are , maple along with cherry. Other than currently being tough, are additionally simple to fresh. Try out averting decanter or glass and pine furniture, specially for the reason that both are extra breakable and can harm your while damaged or perhaps damaged. Individuals style varies. A single little bit of might be old-fashioned nonetheless may well fit with anyone's preferences regarding his / her . As a result, having fortuitous to view the one that fits the is predictable.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×