• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • A Department Only Washington Could Love

    The results are in: The Department of Education (DOE) is the least popular of all federal departments. Considering the stagnate state of U.S. students’ test scores despite ever increasing federal education spending, this should come as no surprise. What should be surprising—and troubling—however, is that some Members of Congress want to allocate even more taxpayer money to this “bureaucratic boondoggle,” as termed by President Ronald Reagan.

    Currently, Congress is considering pumping $10 billion more into the DOE, adding to the recent $80 billion already allocated via the stimulus package. After decades of increased funding for the DOE, created just 30 years ago, its budget now ranks as the third largest of all government agencies. Nonetheless, American students’ achievement has flatlined, and they continue to lag behind their peers internationally.

    This process of taking taxpayer money from states, filtering it through the DOE, and then sending it back to states is inefficient and has done little to boost academic achievement. It has, however, raised the salaries of government employees. Not including executive salaries, the average annual income of a DOE employee this year will be $103,000: nearly double the average annual teacher salary ($53,000 in 2009). Adding to this overblown spending, in 2009 the federal government’s Program Assessment Rating Tool—used to identify ineffective and duplicative programs—reported $359 million in earmarks in the DOE’s budget.

    Furthermore, greater federal funding for education has come with increased federal red tape. This only adds to administrative burden and does nothing to help students learn. Data indicates that even though the federal government contributes only around 10 percent of the funding for education, it is responsible for 41 percent of the administrative compliance burden placed on states. As Washington spends more on education, this burden will likely grow.

    In a time of burgeoning national and state debt, amidst an increasing need for school reform, the answer is not to perpetuate the problems facing the public school system by feeding the federal bureaucracy. States should have greater freedom to implement reforms tailored to the needs of their students instead of being burdened with more one-size-fits-all mandates from the federal government by way of an inefficient and increasingly expensive DOE.

    See below for further information:


    Posted in Education [slideshow_deploy]

    8 Responses to A Department Only Washington Could Love

    1. West Texan says:

      Rachel hit the bulls-eye dead center when she stated "This process of taking taxpayer money from states, filtering it through the DOE, and then sending it back to states is inefficient and has done little to boost academic achievement."

      I've said before on these blogs that education, like health care, is an internal social matter belonging entirely to individual states and/or local governments. Except for military training and service academies, domestic education is none of the federal government's business. Period!

    2. Pingback: When Love Dies How To Save A Hopeless Marriage | Christian Marriage

    3. Pingback: Kristin Cavallari Says Relationship with Jenner Was Fake

    4. Pingback: Life on the Edge: The Keys to a Lifelong Love [VHS] | Christian Marriage

    5. Pingback: Love Romance – RO movie! (euRO Chaos) | East West True Romance

    6. George Colgrove says:

      This department should be shut down. There needs to be criminal investigations with this department and its illegal ties to the NEA. There is no need for the department as each state and local government already has such offices. This is likely one of the most abusive federal agencies in the District with regards to taxpayer resources.

      It is no coincidence that Education related topics are one of the exceptions for information witholding in the federal FOIA (freedom of information act) based program. A program instigated because of federal abuses, in turn run by federal employees. Something sound fishy here? I think the feds have a lot to hide in that department.

      Why is it that when we add more money to a problem, the problem gets worse?

    7. Pingback: C4I Systems And Department Of Defense | Military Information

    8. Pingback: Ideology Over Education

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.