• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Seeking Clarity Amidst Confusion About Social Justice

    Last night Professor Robbie George of Princeton University appeared on a panel discussing social justice on Glenn Beck’s television show. He offered the following comment about the confusion that’s often present in conversations about social justice:

    In the Catholic tradition the concept of social justice has a long history, and an honorable history, and what it refers to is the fair distribution of the benefits and burdens of common life. But what has happened very often [is] … the concept has become corrupted and used as a pretext for advancing what is essentially a … socialist agenda. So I think Catholics have to understand that when you or when we are criticizing “social justice” we don’t mean it in the honorable sense in which it has been used in our tradition. We mean it in the corrupted sense that some people, not all people, use it.

    Catholic thinker Michael Novak has expanded on the best way to pursue the kind of society that Professor George mentions. In a lecture at The Heritage Foundation last year, Novak discussed social justice in terms of “exercising the elementary skills of civil society.” Only through exercising the virtues of cooperation and association, says Novak, can citizens work together for ends that benefit the whole community.

    To bring further clarity to an often confusing conversation, The Heritage Foundation has carefully laid out the proper role of civil society institutions and government in an innovative new resource called Seek Social Justice: Transforming Lives in Need. This six-lesson DVD and small group guide provides a framework for understanding the roots of human need and social breakdown. Viewers are introduced to real-world examples of families, churches, and businesses helping lift people out of poverty and transform their lives. Seek Social Justice can be viewed in its entirety, or ordered for the cost of shipping and handling, at www.seeksocialjustice.com.

    While the phrase “social justice” has been used in different ways to mean different things, there is an approach to helping people in need that is tried and true: people joining together freely in local groups and organizations to care for those in their community. Government should protect these groups—not try to replace them. A truly just society depends on the local, personal, relational ties that bind its members together.

    Posted in Culture [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to Seeking Clarity Amidst Confusion About Social Justice

    1. Billie says:

      Thank you, Glenn Beck and guests. That was absolutely beautiful!

      Christian leaders of the world, it is important not to fall under the influence of government. They will threaten you, invade your mission. But be true to God no matter what the consequential hardship . Your duty is to God's will, not man's or man's government.

      Please use the strength God gave you and wisdom to make it through.

      God Bless.

    2. Rob says:

      I see what they are saying, but the term has pretty much been hijacked. It reminds me of Paul Ryan speaking about the term "progressive." I just don't see it being reclaimed.

    3. Pingback: Seeking Clarity Amidst Confusion About Social Justice | The Foundry: Conservative Policy News. « benupress.com/blog

    4. joeedh, U.S. says:

      Heh. I forget sometimes that there is more to solving social issues then the American Left. I thought research on this sort of thing was relatively new, and I never dreamed anyone had come up with any sort of comprehensive program like this.

      I realized long ago that poverty could only be solved by private citizens; so long as we have such an over-centralized system the government can't do it (I recently lived for a short time in the Netherlands, and I was struct at how much better some EU countries are at solving social problems, simply because they're allowed to solve them at more of a local level).

    5. joeedh, U.S. says:

      Eh not sure if that's clear, but I was basically saying the EU proves (in my mind) that greater state autonomy works better in a modern western society. Our idiot politicians are still stuck in the 70s, when state autonomy meant support for segregation (if they really were for "European-style socialism", they would completely decentralize the federal government and let the states solve problems however they want; that is, after all, how the EU works, and not all EU states choose to use a socialist model, some prefer more market-oriented solutions).

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.