• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Gulf Spill Update: Confusion Reigns Over BP Compensation Fund

    Although it hardly seems possible, there has been a heightened level of confusion surrounding the government’s handling of the oil spill in the Gulf this week. After being forced to create this escrow account, the White House appears to be maneuvering to force BP to use this new account to pay damages to competitors who have lost jobs as a result of the President’s decision to continue to his oil drilling moratorium. During an interview on Monday, Kenneth Feinberg, the “pay czar” who has been tasked with overseeing the BP compensation fund, told CNN that his authority had grown to include paying damages to those affected by the President’s moratorium. As The Times-Picayune reported on their website:

    “Yes, I now have discovered — I didn’t realize this until yesterday — that the moratorium claims will fall under my jurisdiction,” Feinberg said in an interview Monday on CNN.

    “That’s a huge development, and we didn’t know that before?” replied the CNN reporter.

    “I didn’t either,” Feinberg said.

    Feinberg’s claim that he would pay claims to rig workers and other related companies affected by the moratorium from the $20 billion escrow fund set up by BP was met with resistance by the energy giant who said that this latest claim was outside the scope of their original agreement with the White House:

    Last week, BP said that the workers should apply only to the $100 million fund and that the company would not pay rig claims through the $20 billion.

    Bob Dudley, the BP executive now in control of the company’s Gulf response, told reporters that the $100 million fund was set up as a “good-will gesture” in negotiations with The White House.

    Dudley said the company should not have to pay claims related to the moratorium, which he said was caused by a government decision.

    The confusion caused by this public back-and-f0rth only highlights claims by Gulf coast governors like Bobby Jindal of Louisiana who have suggested that the cost of the President’s refusal to allow other oil companies to continue their drilling will far exceed the $100 million set aside.

    Even Feinberg admitted to being confused, confessing “The reason there is so much confusion on the moratorium is because I am getting conflicting signals here.”

    But this confusion is likely the result of an Administration that is making short-term political decisions rather than judgments based on what is most needed to get the spill under control. From his primetime bravado during an interview with Matt Lauer to pushing for a partisan, job-killing “cap-and-tax” bill in his address to the nation—an address meant to focus on the government’s response to oil spill.

    Rather than stirring up more confusion, the White House should be studying Heritage’s Oil Spill To-Do List, a list of 10 action items that can be taken to help address the problem instead of creating new ones.

    Posted in Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    7 Responses to Gulf Spill Update: Confusion Reigns Over BP Compensation Fund

    1. Billie says:

      Government entrapment. From government targeted corporations to government health care. It's all entrapment.

    2. Pingback: Gulf Spill Update: Confusion Reigns Over BP Compensation Fund | Plug The Bleeping Hole

    3. Al, Cleveland says:

      I'm not surprised. Once Obama extorted the original 20B, it was only a matter of time (barely weeks as it turned out) before he wanted to use it for other than the original intended purpose. Soon it will be a general slush fund for anything he wants – bailing out some connected company, funding Obamacare, offering more jobs to political opponents, whatever. Next I predict he'll push BP for more money.

    4. Lloyd Scallan (New O says:

      Be assured, this is not "confusion". It is pure deception! This is the plan! First to

      trick the people into thinking Obama is doing something. Then, after a few months, when more "confusion reigns", and the focus if off, most of the BP money will disappear, into Obama picked political funds. A few people, who this

      excrow account was set up to help, will see a few bucks. But as Fineberg said "there is not enough money in the world to pay all the claims". This of course is the first excuse as to why certain claims will not be paid, while other

      claims, that Obama chooses, will be. It's all deception to allow Obama and the

      Dems to get their greedy hands on this slush fund.

    5. LB, Charlottesville says:

      If an escrow account, where is the escrow agreement? This should indicate, and limit, what types of claims are payable out of the "escrow" account. Do they teach that at Harvard Law School?

      If BP is funding the account without first limiting the types of claims paid out of the fund, shame on them and they should prepare for shareholder claims alleging misuse of funds.

    6. Tim AZ says:

      Well I don't know what else anyone could expect from a community organizer other to create confusion through agitation of everyone involved. We like to call them a one trick pony. On the other hand he seems to be quite good at it.

    7. Randall Holland, Ari says:

      Hey Barry, I want the fund to pay for my house in AZ. Is that OK?

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×