• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • NRC Shuts Down Obama Administration’s Attempt to Close Yucca

    callaway-nuclear2

    In March of 2010, the Department of Energy (DOE) filed a motion to withdraw its licensing application to construct the geologic nuclear materials repository at Yucca Mountain. If successful, the action would essentially terminate the project. Yesterday, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, the three-judge panel charged with conducting licensing hearings for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission rejected that motion. This is a resounding victory for the future of nuclear energy. Though the Board’s decision was a surprise, it was the correct decision. Existing statute is clear that Yucca Mountain shall be the nation’s nuclear waste repository. So absent any technical or scientific justification for the motion to withdraw, moving forward with the President’s request would seem to violate the law. And that is precisely what the Board concluded.

    The ASLB’s decision said:

    Specifically, the NWPA does not give the Secretary [of Energy] the discretion to substitute his policy for the one established by Congress in the NWPA that, at this point, mandates progress toward a merits decision by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission on the construction permit. We conclude that Congress directed both that DOE file the Application [as DOE concedes] and that the NRC consider the Application and issue a final, merits-based decision approving or disapproving the construction authorization application. Unless Congress directs otherwise, DOE may not single-handedly derail the legislated decision making process by withdrawing the Application. DOE’s motion must therefore be denied.

    This does not mean that the fight to save Yucca Mountain is over. The decision can still be appealed to the full, five-member Nuclear Regulatory Commission. However, to overturn the ASLB’s recommendation, especially with such clear-cut conclusions, would raise serious questions about whether or not the NRC was being driven more by political concerns then by protecting public health and safety. Doing so would set a dangerous precedent and undermine the credibility of the NRC system.

    It also does not mean that Yucca Mountain is open for business; it simply allows the NRC to move forward with its license review. In September of 2008, the NRC commenced a three-year, two-track review process to examine Yucca Mountain. One track will determine the technical merits of the facility. Over 100 technical experts are reviewing the application. The other track consists of hearings where parties can challenge the Yucca project. The ASLB is part of this second track.

    Further, while the President might not be permitted to withdraw the application to construct Yucca Mountain, it is highly unlikely that he will actually move to construct it. However, Congress can provide funds and direction to ensure that the program continues moving forward.

    In the end, however, this decision alone does not resolve the issues surrounding long-term nuclear waste management. Yucca remains controversial and uncertain and the United States has no comprehensive used fuel management strategy. The administration should build on this decision by putting forth a comprehensive strategy that:

    1. Acknowledges the importance of deep geological storage;
    2. Supports the NRC in its review of the Yucca application;
    3. Redirects the Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future to consider Yucca Mountain in its deliberations;
    4. Transfers significant responsibility of Yucca Mountain to local Nevadan interests;
    5. Removes civilian radioactive waste management responsibilities from the Department of Energy; and that
    6. Makes nuclear waste producers more responsible for managing their own nuclear waste.

    These reforms would streamline the development of a real solution by moving out of the arduous Department of Energy bureaucracy, give Nevadans control over how best to make Yucca Mountain feasible, and introduce market forces by giving waste produces the incentive to develop cost effective waste management techniques.

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to NRC Shuts Down Obama Administration’s Attempt to Close Yucca

    1. Charley Miller Littl says:

      Until we find a safe means of recycling our spent nuclear material or a means to recycle it faster we need to deposit the waste we have accumulating.

      I am glad the NRC stuck by its regulatory tasks and most of all, embrace and embark on the path President Bush started with his Energy Act of 2005. President Bush had the insight to realize that nuclear energy would have to take up the slack and provide a safe means of supplying our nation with energy.

      I firmly believe and support the nuclear industry and its goals of providing a safe alternative to fossil fuels.

      I am honored to say I lived in Washington during the Governorship of Dixie Lee Ray, I was in the Nuclear Industry at my time spent working at Palo Verde Arizona's nuclear power plant and one which is the largest in the free world.

      We just have to insure its safe, and focus on secure sites to reprocess the material, we can and should do this.

      charleymiller2010

    2. Pingback: PA Pundits - International

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×