• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • The Case for Defense Spending

    Pentagon (Photo by Newscom)

    The country is drowning in red ink. A revolt against rising debt is unleashing a grass roots movement to curb spending. Conservatives all across America are deeply concerned that unless we can get spending under control, we will forever lose our country.

    This is hardly an environment conducive to making the case for more defense spending. To make matters worse the Department of Defense is in the hands of an administration that conservatives do not trust. It’s understandable that they would not want to appear to give a “blank check” to the very administration that is busting the budget with out of control domestic spending.

    But here’s the problem. The Obama administration is cutting defense projects and programs that we need, and doing so by using disingenuous arguments of frugality intended to put conservatives on the defensive. But conservatives should not be on the defensive. National defense is the one area of government that conservatives believe the federal government has a constitutional responsibility to do right. So much of Obama’s spending is unnecessary and of dubious constitutionality. That is not the case in spending on national defense.

    The bottom line is that the Obama administration plans defense budget cuts that will weaken future necessary modernization and other programs. Under their plans, there is no way the U.S. can build the weapons and systems necessary to keep America safe in the coming decades. There are simply not enough “savings” in cutting “waste, fraud and abuse” in Obama’s defense budget to make up for his cuts in modernization and other programs.

    The right question for conservatives is not how much the Pentagon’s budget should be cut in order to contribute to overall budget reductions, but which programs, projects and personnel are needed to defend the country. After we’ve done that, we can then cost it out to include efficiencies. Any savings that can be achieved in reforming logistics or cutting personnel and benefits should be used to help fund the modernization programs and end strength needed to defend the country in the future.

    Anything less will be an arbitrary budget exercise with no grounding in reality. Worse, it would be an excuse to jettison the “peace through strength” model of national defense bequeathed to us by Ronald Reagan.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to The Case for Defense Spending

    1. West Texan says:

      Since Obama feels free to interject federal government into states' domestic affairs, then states have the right to assume national defense matters like border security. Obama and company are not only totally incompetent, they're absolutely the worst hypocrites. Suppose that's our nation's curse for having such inexperienced academics at the helm.

    2. Pingback: » Financial News Update – 06/14/10 NoisyRoom.net: The Progressive Hunter

    3. Pingback: Obama's push for spending to boost economy gets mixed reacti | World Politics

    4. Defense Worker, Washington says:

      Defense spending currently makes up around 23% of the federal budget. If conservatives are at all serious about reducing spending, the defense budget, along with social security and medicare/medicaid, must be on table.

      The FY2010 defense budget is actually set to grow by 3%. I’d like to know at what percentage of the federal budget would the author find defense spending to be at an inappropriately high level. 30%? 50%? How about 60%?

      We can “get defense right” without blowing the budget. It’s time the true conservatives get on board with reigning in defense spending.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.