• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Failing to Deliver on Maternal Health

    Last week thousands of women (and more than a few men, too) attended the Women Deliver 2010 conference on reproductive and maternal health in Washington, D.C. The Women Deliver conference organizers were supported by the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), UNAIDS, UNICEF, and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the conference was partially funded by U.S. taxpayers. The conference advisory group included private organizations such as Amnesty International, Family Care International (FCI), and the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF), whose leaders featured prominently in the discussions and concurrent sessions.

    Meetings on the conference’s politically polarized agenda ranged in focus from human rights and legal issues, such as sessions titled “Without Sexual Rights There is No Maternal Health” and “Why, When, and How to Take a Government to Court for Maternal Deaths,” to a diverting (and almost certainly heat-producing) discussion on climate change called “Condoms and Climate Change: Can Family Planning Save the World?” Presentations on the potential of medical interventions and better healthcare delivery to continue recent improvements in maternal and newborn health, however, were relegated to side panels.  The overriding emphasis of the conference was on increased family planning and abortion projects as the primary tools in reducing maternal mortality and reaching the UN Millennium Development Goals.

    Representatives of the Obama Administration attended in force, touting the President’s Global Health Initiative and his dedication to women’s health, as evidenced, of course, by his decision to restore U.S. funding for UNFPA and the reversal of the Reagan and Bush-era Mexico City Policy that had denied U.S. funding for agencies that provide or promote abortion overseas. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sent a video message, and both Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and U.S. Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women’s Issues Melanne Verveer addressed the conference multiple times. In addition, various representatives from USAID and the White House appeared on panels.

    Heavy hitters from the international community were also present, including UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon, former Chilean president Michele Bachelet, and former Irish president Mary Robinson, to name a few.  All basically sang from the same song sheet of expanding government financing of family planning and “reproductive rights.”  To great applause, Melinda Gates pledged an additional $1.5 billion in funding from the Gates Foundation over five years for family planning and maternal and newborn health.

    Actress Ashley Judd headlined the celebrity presence, while Arianna Huffington moderated a discussion on “Women and Power.” New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof canceled his scheduled appearance on the plenary panel titled “Contraception’s Promise: A Better Life for the World’s Women.”

    One particular trend evident at the conference was the continued and intentional migration of terminology away from terms that reflect marriage and family as core cultural values.  Tailoring these terms to particular audiences was also stressed.  Gill Greer, Director-General of the International Planned Parenthood Federation, asserted that adolescents and young people do not want to talk about “family planning,” but instead want to know about “contraception” and “sexual health” or “healthy sex.” On the other hand, an African parliamentarian insisted that “family planning” or “reproductive health” was a much preferable line item in a government budget than “condoms” or “contraceptives.”

    Unfortunately, Women Deliver 2010 served as yet another forum for the thinly veiled attempt by the Obama Administration and its allies at Planned Parenthood to tap into the global commitments and funding dedicated to maternal and newborn health.  Convening doctors, midwives, and health care advocates from the developing world under the auspices of helping women “deliver” safely proved to be little more than the international version of the Administration’s domestic plan to bail out organizations whose main focus is condom distribution and abortion liberalization.

    Posted in Culture [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to Failing to Deliver on Maternal Health

    1. Ben C. Ann Arbor, MI says:

      Is the UN relevant? Seems to me just another attempt at plant Earth governance. What appears to be missing from the discussion is the ability (intelligence) of third world country citizens to comprehend the human reproductive cycle. Regardless of motives and desired outcomes, the crux of the problem is IQ and culture. I can find a much better use for the Gates fortune – a mere one million dollars would help my business efforts considerably. I will put the money to good use for the benefit of my clients. How about it Melinda?

    2. Jane Roberts Redland says:

      This commentary is ridiculous. Women's health, education, equality and human rights are central to any hope for the future. That was the message of the Women Deliver Conference. I ought to know, I was there. I am cofounder of 34 Million Freinds of the United Nations Population Fund which offers safe delivery, family planning and Aids and violence prevention in the world's poorest countries. There ain't nothing wrong with condoms. They serve a wonderful double purpose, family planning and AIDS prevention. And frankly, from time immemorial, women have turned to abortion, and they even risk their very lives to do what they feel is best for themsleves and their families. So cut women a little slack. When the world takes care of women, women take care of the world. UNFPA, which is not involved in abortion, saves and improves the lives of women by the ton, i.e. it takes care of women. Get just a little bit real! Cheers, Jane http://www.34millionfriends.org

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.