• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • US Must Lead Where EU Falters

    The US Government looked on in shock this week when Turkey defied its traditional allies including the United States and Israel, and voted against UN sanctions for Iran. Ankara had already tried to stall a fourth round of sanctions by negotiating a flawed nuclear deal with the atomic ayatollahs. U.S. defense secretary Robert Gates has said that Turkey’s strategic drift away from the West is due, in part, to the European Union’s reluctance to accept them into the alliance.

    Turkey has been a key NATO ally since the ‘50s, and the U.S. largely assumed that Ankara’s path to EU membership would be as smooth as the other 21 members common to both alliances.

    Not so.

    German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Nicolas Sarkozy have been at the forefront of opposing full Turkish membership of the European Union, proposing instead a privileged partnership between Ankara and Brussels.

    Having European leaders talk about privileged partnerships at the same time as accession prospects is profoundly unwise. There is a pervasive sense in Ankara that the EU is negotiating with them in bad faith. The Turkish Government has undertaken significantly difficult reforms to align itself more closely with the EU’s body of law, but the feeling that Brussels may not be serious about its eventual accession has helped push Turkey toward its eastern neighbors. Favorable polling toward the EU currently stands at just 22 percent.

    There are more than a handful of EU countries which would likely veto Turkish membership when a final vote is taken. Bringing Turkey to the finish line and then denying them membership would be a disaster for the region. The EU should therefore seek to advance tangible projects with Turkey as opposed to merely a technocratic membership action plan which is unlikely to be honored in the end.

    The United States must also realize that it does not have a vote over who does or doesn’t accede to the EU and not burn political capital pushing for something that won’t happen. It must further accept that the EU is in no position to play a regional leadership role. Whether it be relations with Russia or Turkish estrangement from the West, the EU is incapable of thinking strategically or long-term in foreign policy terms.

    President Obama should also refrain from associating Turkish membership of the EU with the west’s relationship with the Muslim world more generally. Should Turkey not accede to the EU, it will not be because it is a Muslim country.

    There has to be obligations for Turkey as well, regardless of its EU-accession status. As a member of the NATO alliance, and a key U.S. partner, Ankara cannot afford to undermine solid regional allies such as Israel, while cozying up to odious dictators such as Iranian leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and genocide-indicted Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir.

    A European Union which could grow to 40 members in the future certainly needs to be more flexible with new membership arrangements for different countries—including existing countries such as Britain which is clearly uncomfortable with its current membership terms. Flexible membership arrangements and privileged partnerships may well be the future for the EU and several other partners moving forward. For the U.S., the valuable lesson here is that no one is yet ready to supplant its leadership on the European Continent.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to US Must Lead Where EU Falters

    1. JOE MISH , Berkeley, says:

      I suggest Heritage compiles a list of the 100 most important books to recommend for Heritage members reading. Two or three lists for different ages. The Heritage recommendation would be welcome. When you are looking for something to read, pick something from the Heritage list.

    2. franckp says:

      "Should Turkey not accede to the EU, it will not be because it is a Muslim country."

      I strongly disagree, the only reason why most europeans are against the candidature of Turkey is because it is a muslim country.

      I'm french, and I can swear that it is the only reason why europeans do not agree. People over there do not even hide it.

    3. Drew Page, IL says:

      To franckp — I agree with your comments. Turkey is a Muslim country and will side with other Muslim countries on most issues.

    4. Allen Logue, UT says:

      I profoundly disagree with the author's support of and DefSec Gates' comment: "U.S. defense secretary Robert Gates has said that Turkey’s strategic drift away from the West is due, in part, to the European Union’s reluctance to accept them into the alliance."

      The primary reason for Turkey's drift from the West has little to do with EU membership. It is first and foremost the result of Turkey electing an Islamist president that has and continues to make comments antagonistic to the West and is working towards closer strategic ties with terror-exporting countries (Syria, Iran, et al.). The fact that Turkey is making these changes so quickly seems to me to justify the reluctance of EU member states supporting Turkey's acceptance.

    5. Paul, Scotland says:

      Turkey's accession to the European Union would be the greatest disaster to befall Europe since the rise of Adolf Hitler. A Muslim population of 15 million people is currently causing enormous problems throughout Western Europe. If Turkey's population of 80 million more Muslims gain the right to live and work throughout Europe, these problems will be enormously exacerbated. It will lead to the disintegration of the European Union, the emergence of right-wing anti-immigrant parties and leaders and the transformation of Europe into Eurabia.

      In the long term, the islamisation of Europe is not in America's interests, to say the least. It is time you stopped using your diplomatic leverage to push for it; if anything, you should be using what diplomatic leverage you have to push against it.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.