• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Elena Kagan's War on the Military

    Elena Kagan’s treatment of military recruiters while dean of Harvard Law School was supposed to be an insignificant blip during her Supreme Court confirmation. Vice President Joe Biden, for instance, brushed aside the suggestion that she did anything wrong in a recent TV interview.

    But a closer look at the timeline of events reveals Kagan mounted an unprecedented legal challenge to bar recruiters from visiting the Cambridge campus.

    Today the Washington Post adds new details of the struggle Kagan faced: appeasing gay activists on campus vs. satisfying the military’s desire to recruit top talent. The article sheds light on Kagan’s interactions with the Harvard Law School Veterans Association.

    Author Amy Goldstein introduces new information to the story through a series of interviews with former students, but also leaves out some important facts.

    The Harvard Law School website has a treasure trove of information that spells out exactly what happened — and more importantly, when it happened — during Kagan’s time as dean.

    The first myth, taken verbatim from Goldstein’s article: “Kagan inherited the recruiting controversy when she became dean in 2003.” That’s simply not true. In reality, Kagan inherited a policy from former Dean Robert Clark that gave military recruiters full, unfettered access to campus. Clark reversed Harvard’s long-standing policy opposing military recruiters on July 29, 2002, because the U.S. Air Force threatened the university’s federal funding two months earlier. It’s spelled out in detail in a Harvard news release.

    The second (and more important) myth involves what happened after the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on the constitutionality of the Solomon Amendment, a law Congress passed in 1996 giving the Pentagon the authority to deny federal funds to universities that prohibit military recruitment on campus. The appeals court, on Nov. 29, 2004, instructed a district court in New Jersey to issue a preliminary injunction suspending enforcement of the law.

    Goldstein writes: “In November 2004, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit said the law linking federal aid to recruiting help was unconstitutional. Kagan announced that Harvard would no longer provide such help.”

    What Goldstein fails mention is that the court’s decision didn’t even apply to Massachusetts, which is located in the 1st U.S. Circuit. This is the same mistake Biden made in his interpretation of events.

    In other words, Kagan was under no legal requirement to reinstate Harvard’s ban on military recruiters. She made the decision on her own.

    Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) took note of the left’s desire to ignore the facts. He said on Monday:

    I think it’s time we get these facts straight. It is a significant matter, a very significant matter, and it is a matter of significance such that whoever comments about it, whether it’s the Vice President of the United States even, they should be accurate.

    As more details emerge about this episode in Kagan’s career, it’s imperative the Senate Judiciary Committee press her on it.

    Posted in Scribe [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Elena Kagan's War on the Military

    1. West Texan says:

      Discrimination based on sexual orientation??? I know, one's religious belief is also a choice. So the question becomes where do you draw the line? An al Qaeda wannabe jihadist who was entrusted with the care of young innocent soldiers? Or a flaming queen who's got the bunk next to yours? "What?" you say. "All Muslims are not murderers anymore than gays are flaming queens." This may be true. But tell that to the young homesick GI standing their post on some lonely stretch of desert. Or the sailor trying to catch Zs below deck prior to his watch. It's hard enough looking over your shoulder for an enemy and/or situational threat. Discrimination of lifestyle choice is a legitimate concern for the military. Harvard would come up with something naive like this. After all, they did give us Obama. And he's offering Kagan as another Harvard genius for the high court.

    2. Pingback: Kagan’s complete disregard for the Constitution(Treason) :

    3. Pingback: The Cloakroom » Kagan Contributions: Elena Kagan Hates the Military But Likes Bio-Food

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.