• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Tax Extenders Bill Still Contains Irresponsible Spending Increases and Dangerous Tax Hikes

    Congressional leaders have responded to the backlash against the original $174 billion cost of the “tax extenders” bill by reducing its cost by $47 billion. Even with the reduction, the bill will still add $84 billion to the deficit over the next decade. They have reduced the amount of spending in the most cynical fashion possible – by cutting the number of years over which the spending would occur. Of course, they have every intention of extending the spending again when the current extensions expire.

    The irresponsible overspending in the tax extenders bill is not the only fatal flaw of the legislation. The $43 billion of tax increases included in the bill to offset part of its cost will slow the recovery of the fragile economy. Even worse, Congress is once again in such a rush to pass a bill it isn’t bothering to figure out the broader impact these tax hikes, especially those affecting U.S. businesses operating abroad, could have on the economy and the competitiveness of United States businesses that operate internationally.

    Of greatest concern in this regard are the proposed reductions of the foreign tax credit that would severely curtail the ability of United States businesses that operate internationally to avoid double taxation and will drive countless more jobs – and even corporate headquarters — overseas. That’s for sure. But what isn’t certain is how much damage would be done.  The troubling changes to the foreign tax credit came out of the clear blue sky. No one, including Congress and the businesses that would be affected, has had time to get a handle on how the provisions would operate or the broader impact they will have on the United States’ international competitiveness.

    The changes to the tax treatment of S-corporations included in the bill raise significant concerns because there has been no analysis of the economic impact they will have either.  On Tuesday, President Obama referred to himself as a “fierce advocate” for small business.  If he signs legislation containing these tax changes, small businesses are going to wonder who, with fierce advocates like this, needs tame enemies.

    Congress should stop its rush and give the business community time to understand the provisions and comment on them as appropriate, and recognize that lashing business with punitive taxes is a tough economic policy to defend especially when the unemployment rate is near 10 percent.

    The reductions in spending that are supposed to sweeten the deal and make the harmful tax hikes more palatable come from reducing the extensions of unemployment insurance (UI) and COBRA health insurance coverage by 1 month (the original bill extended both through December 2010, the new bill scales that back to November 2010) and by putting off reductions in payments to doctors that accept Medicare – the “doc fix” – for 2 years instead of the 4 years in the original bill.

    The savings from limiting the extensions of these programs will no doubt be short-lived. Congress will undoubtedly continue to extend UI, COBRA subsidies and bailouts for state Medicaid programs as long as unemployment remains high – even though evidence is mounting that extended UI prolongs unemployment for recipients.

    The doc fix is a longer-term problem that requires a permanent fix from Congress. Of the $47 billion of spending taken out of the original bill, $40 billion comes from taking 2 years off the doc fix. Further temporary extensions are a certainty until Congress passes a permanent fix, so the “savings” in the current tax extenders bill are really nonexistent. There is no way Congress can allow a 33 percent reduction of payments to doctors that is scheduled under current law to take place in 2012 because that would jeopardize access for millions of seniors who depend on Medicare.

    Congress needs to slow down. There is broad bipartisan consensus that the tax extenders provisions should be passed. A better approach would be to address those provisions alone, without the unnecessary and damaging tax hikes, and put off all such spending until Congress has found responsible spending cuts to pay for them.

    Posted in Economics [slideshow_deploy]

    7 Responses to Tax Extenders Bill Still Contains Irresponsible Spending Increases and Dangerous Tax Hikes

    1. Tim Az says:

      Here's something to think about. By continually extending U.I. And cobra are the liberals training these recipients to vote for more of the easy money in exchange of their dignity? Much like training a monkey to perform a task for a minor reward.

    2. Lynn Bryant DeSpain says:

      If I understand correctly, and I am quite sure that I do, then three things are apparent;

      1. We are not spending 2x amount of dollars over the next ten years, instead we are only going to spend 1x amount of dollars over the next 5 years.

      2. While spending this money for the next five years, we are going to increase taxes, fees, and tarrif, so that we will have the additional 1x of money to spend the next five year period.

      3. Our President is an idiot, a dolt a fool, a clown, a puppet to those who pull his strings, a manipulated manipulator.

    3. Pingback: House Democrats Vote to Raise Taxes « The Harvard Political Review

    4. Jo, Texas says:

      I guess Tim is not one of the monkeys that has been trying to get a job for the past 8 months to no avail. If he were one of the ones that has applied for hundreds of jobs along with several thousands of others then we would see who is exchanging their dignity for easy money. If you think that looking for a job in these times you are sadly mistaken.

    5. Pingback: Just Average American » Blog Archive » A Tax-Policy Primer

    6. Pingback: Now is the Worst Possible Time for Tax Hikes | Step Down Obama

    7. Scott, Montana says:

      to Jo in Texas.

      I understand where you're coming from, but consider this. For every person like you that is actually actively seeking a job, there are those who fill out applications just to satisfy the requirements of UE. I took a temporary job in a company while still seeking full time employment. I worked for the person who interviewed prospective employees. I can't tell you how many times we'd get an application, interview the person, and when we offered them a job, we'd hear something like; "Could you hold the position for a couple of months, my unemployment hasn't run out yet."; or for temporary positions, "Can we make this cash, so I don't have to report it to UE?"

      For every person who truly needs UE benefits to survive, there are probably five or more who are milking the system because the Government keeps giving them extensions. I hope you find work soon.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×