• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • You Gotta Fight, for Our Right, to Missile Defense

    Yesterday, Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) clashed head on with Obama administration officials in the first hearing over New START, a proposed nuclear arms control treaty that the White House has submitted to the Senate for ratification. DeMint hammered home the point that the treaty would limit how future presidents could pursue missile defenses.

    Secretary Gates brushed off the concerns as did the Committee Chair John Kerry dismissing the notion that the White House has come up with anything but the perfect missile defense plan. But others argue the White House plan is inadequate, furthermore in the future conditions and threats may change—why should the United States have to go back to Russia to get permission to defend itself. Senator Kerry has no problem seeking a permission slip from the Russians. As  The New York Times reported, Senator DeMint thinks it is a terrible idea: “With his response, Senator Kerry proved why Americans have a hard time fully trusting the left to put American interests first in foreign affairs.”

    In fact, the administration knows the proposed treaty limits future missile defense program. That’s it why it rushed to rewrite the White House fact sheet which first claimed the treaty put no limits on missile defense. The rewrite suggests that treaty won’t limit Obama’s plans. Even that statement is cold comfort. Obama’s plan does not look like it will be adequate to deal with an Iranian threat, let alone the likes of the Russian nuclear force. Under the government’s own estimate Iran could have a long-range missile, three years before it gets a missile defense umbrella up and running in Europe.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to You Gotta Fight, for Our Right, to Missile Defense

    1. Phil says:

      Since when does missile defense cover Russia? I've been hearing since the formation of the Missile Defense Agency, and SECDEF Gates that missile defense is defense against rogue states, not Russia.

      And as far as I can tell, we have systems in place and are working on systems to defend against those threats.

      Besides, missile defense against Russia, as Gates suggested, upsets strategic stability-so not to prevent a first strike-and is insanely expensive.

    2. Pingback: Wonk Room » DeMint And The Right Want A New Cold War

    3. Pingback: Wonk Room » Senator DeMint Thinks Cold War Still On, Wants Missile Defense To Protect Against Soviet Union

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×