• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Only VAT Can Fund Leftist Welfare State

    Recently in the Wall Street Journal, David Ranson pointed out what tax economists have known for a long time: no matter what changes Congress makes to the existing tax code, it will continue to raise the same amount of revenue as a percentage of GDP year-after-year. Ranson writes:

    Despite big changes in marginal tax rates in both directions,”Hauser’s Law,” as I call this formula, reveals a kind of capacity ceiling for federal tax receipts at about 19% of GDP.

    The income tax is the predominant revenue raiser for the federal government, and fluctuations in the revenue it collects have the biggest effect on the total change in tax collections year-to-year. Over the course of its history the top rate has been as high as 91 percent and as low as 28 percent. Even with such large variations in top rates, the income tax has raised a remarkably consistent amount of revenue as the chart shows.

    Revenue remains constant as the top rate changes because taxpayers change their behavior to account for changes in rates. For example, when the top rate is high, workers faced with handing over a substantial portion of every additional dollar of income earned often chose not to work those extra hours. In addition, they will work harder to take advantage of every opportunity to the tax code affords them to reduce their tax liability. Lastly, workers will shift how they receive their income to limit their tax exposure. Some will take their income in the form of capital gains and dividends instead of wage income because those forms are taxed at lower rates. Or they will take compensation in non-income form like tax-free employer-provided health insurance, a bigger expense allowance for decorating their offices, a company car, or season tickets for the local baseball team. There are countless other examples, each of which also a form of compensation that is not taxable like wage and salary income.

    Each of these efforts reduces tax collections and creates a drag on the economy – especially reducing work effort. In contrast, when tax rates are lower, workers do not need to engage in these efforts to keep their taxes minimal. They are more willing to work longer hours because they get to keep more of what they earn, they don’t need to expend their resources and time to squeeze every last deduction out of the tax code, and they are more willing to take their income in wages and salary than in other forms.

    These behavioral changes explain why the income tax raises consistent amounts of revenue no matter what the top rate. They also show why substantial tax increases outside the federal income tax will remain a continual threat in the near future. As explained above, the tax code, even with all the changes to income tax rates, consistently raises no more than 19 percent of GDP. In fact, it has averaged 18.2 percent of GDP in the post World War II era. Spending over that same period has averaged about 20 percent of GDP. That means the United States has averaged a budget deficit around 2 percent of GDP during that span.

    In the near future, once economic recovery picks up, federal tax revenues will rebound to their upper-bound historical average. But if Congress permanently pushes spending above 24 percent of GDP as President Obama called for in his budget, the deficit will consistently remain at unsustainable levels. The current tax code cannot raise the revenue necessary to support that level of spending, and all the nickel and dime tax increases we’ve seen of late certainly won’t cover for that level of profligacy.

    That is why a concerted push from the left for a new broad-based tax, the value added tax (VAT), is revving into high gear. A VAT with a high enough rate could raise enough revenue to pay for the cradle-to-grave entitlements liberals have long desired. Without it they know they will have no choice but to give up their bigger government dreams and constrain spending to historical levels.

    If Congress gives in to temptation and passes a VAT, it would forever expand the size of government and be an enormous tax increase that would raise the prices of everything we buy. Some have suggested a rate as high as 20 percent. At that level, the VAT would transfer about $1.5 trillion annually at the end of the decade from productive private hands to the wasteful hand of government.

    A VAT in addition to the current tax code would also solidify in place the economic damage caused by the existing tax system and add on a new layer of inefficiency. The added economic drag created by the VAT and the massive amount of resources taken out of the economy by the VAT combined would significantly and permanently curtail economic growth.

    That is why it is so important to stop the VAT. Despite the best efforts of some to make it appear the VAT is inevitable, Congress can reduce spending down to the historical average and the United States can remain VAT-free.

    Posted in Economics [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to Only VAT Can Fund Leftist Welfare State

    1. Todd, Albany OR says:

      Regarding the comment, "they will work harder to take advantage of every opportunity to the tax code affords them to reduce their tax liability": I'll bet people will also be more likely to take advantage of opportunities that the tax code does NOT allow. In other words, excessive tax rates serve as a temptation to break the law.

    2. Jeanne Stotler, wood says:

      We soon will be like most European countries, 70% of earned income will go to taxes, and the USA will not be as we know it now, many states will become new countries as they try to avoid what BHO and his cronies are trying to do. Let's stop this madness and continue what has been started put those in Congress who will live up to the oath that they WILL UPHOLD the Constitution lower taxes, balance the budget and return States rights, most of all repeal the OBAMA care.

    3. Drew Page, IL says:

      "As long as you got a dime, the music won't never stop." These lyrics from the old Chuck Berry song, Rollover Beethoven, seem to reflect the thinking of the proponents of the VAT.

      As long as taxpayers have a dime, government taxes won't never stop.

    4. Lynn Bryant DeSpain says:

      "Tax the rich to feed the poor, until there is no rich to tax no more."

    5. Pingback: HOUSE DEMS BLOCK EFFORTS TO CLOSE GITMO / SPREAD THE RISK, EVERYBODY DRAW MOHAMMED! / RASMUSSEN: ARIZONA GOV. BREWER +19% IN ARIZONA / SOLID MAJORITY SUPPORT ARIZON LAW IN 2 POLLS / DEMS AREN'T WORRIED ABOUT NOVEMBER? / HOSPITALS TO PAY FOR SMALL BUSINESS

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×