• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Obama’s "Line-Item Veto" Really Just Tweaking Existing Authority

    Later this month, the Obama Administration is expected to submit a plan to Congress seeking additional power to cut specific items from spending bills. This proposal is commonly called the “Line-Item Veto,” named after the law ruled unconstitutional in the 1990’s. However, line-item vetoes did not require Congressional approval, while these rescissions do. Obama’s anticipated proposal, correctly labeled “enhanced rescission,” would give the President 45 days after signing a spending bill to submit items to Congress for elimination. Congress would then be forced to schedule an up or down vote within 25 days either approving or rejecting the proposal.

    Certainly any proposal to eliminate unnecessary and wasteful spending should be applauded. However, the extent to which enhanced recession is an effective tool for significant deficit reduction shouldn’t be misconstrued. Relying on enhanced rescission to reduce the federal deficit is akin to depending on an X-Acto Knife to cut down a forest of giant redwood trees.

    Of $43 trillion in spending since 1990, Presidents have proposed rescinding only $20 billion, and Congress has approved just $6 billion in rescissions (.01 percent of all spending). Further, neither President Obama, nor President Bush before him has even proposed a single rescission. While a process which has saved $6 billion over 20 years is better than nothing, it will hardly close a deficit which is projected to top $1 trillion through 2011. Although the Obama proposal would strengthen current law by preventing Congress from simply ignoring the package, other significant hurdles remain.

    Specifically, the spending cuts the President would send to Congress for elimination would be the same items members of Congress spent months attempting to pass in the first place. It is unclear why Congress would immediately vote to repeal spending provisions they just recently negotiated and passed.

    While cutting a few extraneous spending items is a commendable aspiration, and forcing members of Congress to go on the record against spending reductions may help a bit, Americans and politicians alike must put these types of proposals into perspective. Small reductions can add up, but without serious entitlement reform returning the country to long-term fiscal sustainability will remain a dream.

    Posted in Economics [slideshow_deploy]

    6 Responses to Obama’s "Line-Item Veto" Really Just Tweaking Existing Authority

    1. Suzanne, Fort Myers says:

      Very clear, concise explanation with which I couldn't agree more!!!! Keep up the good work Heritage!!!

    2. Suzanne, Fort Myers says:

      Very clear concise explanation with which I couldn't agree more. Keep up the good work Heritage.

    3. Edgar says:

      So is this article suggesting that instead of adhering to the principles of separate branches of government as laid out by our Constitution, Obama should seek to trample the Constitution by requesting legislative power through a real line item veto?

    4. gail Edinburg says:

      seems to be the hallmark of this administration to muddy the waters with an endless number of their "works in progress" many of them useless or confusing to hide their ultimate ends. very frustrating, and concerning.

    5. plainolcitizen says:

      What a joke. This is another diversion to make it look like he will "do " something about the deficit. There is NO way he wil/can look at the entire budget and "pick" out wasteful or unneccessary spending, the only thing he MIGHT do, is cut out any bill that is desired by the republican congressional members.

    6. stirling, Pennsylvan says:

      This administration has shown all it wants to do is to "Grow Government" and takeover the private sector industries in whole chunks. So the only shrinking that is going to happen in this country will only be in the private sector (which the president has proven he is willing to do.) The whole "line item" is just a "dog and pony show."

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×