• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Nothing New in NYT's Nuke Modernization Spin

    New York , NY - The New York Times Manhattan headquarters building.

    The headline of Peter Baker’s New York Times article “Obama Expands Modernization of Nuclear Arsenal” could not be more misleading.

    The article touts the release of a presidential report to Congress outlining the President’s plan to spend $80 billion. What the article does not tell you is that in all that spending there is no commitment from the White House to modernize nuclear weapons, all the President plans on doing is dumping tens-of-billions of dollars into federal labs and universities without spelling out a clear military mission their activities are to support and to by-off Senators for their support in voting for the New START deal with Russia.

    Other than a wildly misleading title, there is no news here. The Nuclear Posture Review that the Pentagon sent to Congress last month declared that the military would dump more money into upgrading Defense Department, Department of Energy and laboratory infrastructure: “The United States will modernize the nuclear weapons infrastructure.” A Pentagon fact sheet states: “The United States will modernize the nuclear weapons infrastructure, sustain the science, technology, and engineering base, invest in human capital, and ensure senior leadership focus.”

    Obama, in fact, has specifically rejected modernizing the US nuclear arsenal. Indeed, the goal of spending more money on infrastructure is “facilitate further reductions,” not develop the nuclear arsenal needed to protect and defend America.

    For more, see The New START Working Group’s Independent Assessment of New START Treaty.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to Nothing New in NYT's Nuke Modernization Spin

    1. philip maxon says:

      Define modernization. The article never does. Is it LEP or erLEP?

    2. Pingback: 33 Minutes

    3. Pingback: START Problems Proliferating | Conservative Principles Now

    4. Pingback: 33 Minutes

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.