• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Side Effects: What’s a Medical Expense?

    Vague statutory language can make laws hard to interpret and enforce. And that’s certainly true of the recently-passed Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

    Exhibit A: Obamacare requires insurers to spend at least 85 percent of group market premiums–and 80 percent of individual market premiums–on medical expenses.  The remainder goes to administrative costs and profits. But what does–and doesn’t–count as a medical expense?  Health insurers, legislators and regulators are already haggling over that question.

    As Politico’s Sarah Kliff reports, “Claims for visits to physicians clearly fit the bill; likewise for surgeries and hospital stays. But what about a 24-hour nursing hotline? Does a flier in the mail that encourages subscribers to reduce sodium intake count? Or a new computer system to better manage care for multiple chronic conditions?”  Clearly, insurers will want to claim all such activities as medical loss.

    While the 80% and 85% benchmarks invite confusion, they do nothing to improve the insurance system. Consistently high medical loss ratios can undermine the financial stability of insurers.  Moreover, as Dr. James C. Robinson, a professor of health economics at the University of California, pointed out in an article in Health Affairs, “the medical loss ratio never was and never will be an indicator of clinical quality.” It’s hard to see how the bankruptcy of an insurance company will benefit their consumers.

    The push to raise medical loss ratios is part and parcel of the war on administrative costs. The left’s notion is that if health insurance companies reduce administrative costs, the savings will be passed on to their consumers. That argument doesn’t hold water. Effective administration is needed to prevent fraud, eliminate waste and keep all costs from getting out of hand.  It’s part of the solution, not the problem.

    To keep their financial ship from taking on water, insurers will continue to negotiate with the government over what constitutes a medical expense. Notes Kliff, it’s just another instance of how Obamacare, ”despite its breadth and length, still leaves much space for policy and political maneuvering.” But then, that’s typical of poorly constructed, hastily approved legislation.

    Posted in Obamacare [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to Side Effects: What’s a Medical Expense?

    1. J.C. Hughes, Texas says:

      Federal government pushing their way into the private health insurance market is akin to a willful bully taking over and controlling every hand in a round of poker, as this relates to risks. Is it right? No! Is it constitutional? No! Did the congressional leadership and their presidential lackey go ahead and takeover something that's none of their affair? Yes! It's now time for "CHANGE". In file order with his congressional puppet masters this coming November, Obama has given me "HOPE" he and his leftist cronies will be out on the street in 2012.

    2. Pingback: » Financial News Update – 05/12/10 NoisyRoom.net: The Progressive Hunter

    3. Billie says:

      In the mail came a 5 1/2 x 9 5/8 sealed envelope with an invitation to: "take advantage of the State Department of Health's FREE mammogram program. If you have no insurance, we may cover the costs. Or, if you are insured, there's a good chance we can cover your co-pay and deductible!"

      Is this part of the government medical expense? Oh sorry, forgot the biggest kicker of all, "Special offer for new participants! Get a free mammogram… and $20.00!" …government must be hurting for business.

    4. Dexter60, San Franci says:

      After the criminally insane have taken over the asylum completely they will try to take over the town … it ain't gonna happen. The dogs will get them first.

      Some laws just cannot be broken.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×