• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • The Bill Is Still Flawed

    The Dodd-Obama Permanent TARP

    The latest word today is that the GOP is standing down from its standoff over the Senate’s financial-regulation bill. Specifically, word is that Republican leaders will now let the bill proceed to the floor, having received assurances that provisions for creditor bailouts will be removed. That’s not an insignificant improvement, despite the fact that President Obama has said that it is not “legitimate” to raise the issue of bailouts. But no one should think this bill is fixed. Far from it: Beyond the creditor bailout, I’ve counted at least 13 other problems with the plan. One of the most troubling is at the core of the bill: the creation of seizure authority — politely called “orderly liquidation authority” — for firms perceived by regulators to be failing. To be sure, orderly liquidation is a Good Thing. But the Senate bill achieves it by allowing federal regulators, with minimal judicial review, to take over troubled financial firms and wind up their affairs. It would be far better to use the time-tested bankruptcy system, with its legal protections and judicial supervision, to do the job.

    Skeptics say that that would be unworkable for financial firms. But the idea got some little-noticed support recently from the Judicial Conference of the United States, a council of federal judges presided over by the Chief Justice of the United States. In a letter to Sen. Patrick Leahy, the group pointed out that under the Senate bill, some firms already in bankruptcy would be forced out, and into FDIC receivership — an odd result if bankruptcy is not a viable option. The letter then went on to point out that the (very) limited judicial review of seizures provided by the pending legislation may be unconstitutional, and criticized the 24-hour deadline for such review as “inconsistent with the thoughtful deliberation” needed for a decision of such great significance. These are not concerns, nor are they from a source, to be taken lightly. Before declaring the financial-regulation bill “fixed,” members should take another look at seizure authority, as well as other flaws in the plan.

    Cross-posted at The Corner.

    Posted in Economics [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to The Bill Is Still Flawed

    1. Pingback: » Financial News Update – 04/29/10 NoisyRoom.net: The Progressive Hunter

    2. GRUMPY IN SURPISE, A says:

      I CAN'T THINK OF ONE THING THAT THE GOVERNMENT DOSE WELL, SO WHY DO SO MANY PEOPLE THINK THE GOVERNMENT IS READY AND ABLE TO DO THIS WELL? AS I REMEMBER THINGS IN THE MID 1990'S IT WAS THIS SAME GOVERNMENT THAT TOLD THE BANKS NO MORE RED LINING POOR AREAS OF RUN DOWN HOMES. ALSO THEY MUST MAKE NEW LOANS IN NICE NEW AREAS TO THE SAME LOW INCOME PEOPLE AT VERY LOW RATES. EVEN IF THE RATES WOULD BE ADJUSTED UPWARD IN FUTURE YEARS. THIS WAS JUST ANOTHER HAND OUT THAT WAS SOLD TO THE PUBLIC AS A HAND UP FOR THE POOR. GRUMPY

    3. Tim Wareham ma says:

      Where in this bill does it make the so called to big to fail any accountable? I wish I could make very risky decisions with the knowledge that I will be bailed out by the Government?

      This bill is nothing but a slap in the face of us tax payers who are too small to succeed.h

      If this was a true reform bill Fannie and freddie would be included. Why are they not included? I am tired of this administration lies and strong arm tactics to get things done

      there way.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×