• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • How Bad is the Lincoln Derivatives Bill?

    It makes a future market melt-down more likely.

    Today the Senate takes up Senator Blanche Lincoln’s amendment to regulate over-the-counter derivatives. The Lincoln bill is very, very bad, but don’t take out word for it, ask the Federal Reserve. Fed Staffers released a four page, seven point critique saying the Lincoln bill would “impair financial stability and strong prudential regulation of derivatives; would have serious consequences for the competitiveness of US financial institutions; and would be highly disruptive and costly, both for banks and their customers.”

    The first point of the Fed “staff” critique echoes a point made in a 1990 article by then-Princeton professor Ben Bernanke explaining that derivatives clearinghouses are an integral part of the larger banking and payment system. Bernanke explained how Fed actions in to assure emergency funding to derivative clearinghouses avoided a “market breakdown” in the course of the 1987 stock market crash.

    In reaction to the 2008 crisis the Lincoln bill would wholly divorce derivatives trading from banking and prohibit Fed involvement with derivatives dealers and clearinghouses. Lincoln’s throw-the-baby-out-with-the-bathwater approach would make it more likely that the next stock market crash will produce a total melt-down.

    As another informed observer puts it, the biggest “systemic risk” to the economy is Congress, not derivatives dealers.

    Posted in Economics [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to How Bad is the Lincoln Derivatives Bill?

    1. Pingback: » Financial News Update – 04/29/10 NoisyRoom.net: The Progressive Hunter

    2. Norman Rogers says:

      The Lincoln bill may be bad, but derivatives are worse. Two names spring to mind: Robert Citron (Orange County, CA) and Nicholas Leeson (Barings).

      Speculate in derivatives, and you can ruin a municipality, a company, and, in recent years, very nearly a world economy.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×