• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • China and the Nuclear Summit

    While Chinese President Hu Jintao’s decision to attend the Nuclear Security Summit is being hailed as a sign of improving Sino-US relations, President Hu’s speech at the summit suggests that rough times still lie ahead. In his speech at the summit, President Hu apparently focused on the importance of honoring national commitments towards nuclear security, strengthening bilateral and multilateral cooperation, helping developing countries improve nuclear security, consolidating existing international legal measures, and demarcating the relationship between nuclear security and nuclear energy. None of these measures, in and of themselves, are objectionable, just as the goal of the summit, to keep nuclear weapons out of the hands of terrorist organizations, is laudable.

    The question is: Where’s the beef?

    When it comes to actually compelling Iran, a supporter of terrorist organizations, to abide by its obligations under the NPT, China has shown little stomach for the necessary measures. Similarly, one suspects that the Chinese will also fail to enforce sanctions against anyone else who fails to honor national commitments.

    Where the Chinese proposals constitute an interesting revelation is the idea of consolidating the existing international conventions. These are The Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and The International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism. This underscores the longstanding Chinese interest in having a role in the formulation of new international legal regimes.

    Unfortunately, if Chinese treatment of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea is an indicator, China’s will be trying to manipulate the system solely for its own ends. Indeed, China’s idiosyncratic readings of how its Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZ) are measured and its right to access the Arctic suggest that the intent is not to promote international law, but to secure Chinese interests through the use of legal warfare or “lawfare.”

    Thus, while the Hu Jintao’s proposals may merit further study, said examinations should be undertaken with a careful eye towards loopholes and fuzzy language that the Chinese will exploit to the fullest.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to China and the Nuclear Summit

    1. Norma in Nebraska says:

      Let me see if I understand this: China is a major player in the world now and is not interested in curbing the development of nuclear weapons. One has to wonder who China will turn to if they are threatened by those unstable countries developing this technology!!!

      Of course, since China owns a significant amount of our debt I suppose they can demand that we come to their aid . . . . . . and this administration will bow and say, "Your wish is my command."

      Sad state of affairs in the United States of America if you ask me! Since when do we have to wait for a consensus of the countries of the world before we take a stand and stop this kind of blackmail???

    2. hey, nj says:

      get used to it!

    3. ack says:

      It's simple, every country has their own interests, interests of the United States may not be the interest of other countries. China has every right to act in accordance with its own interests just like the United States.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×