• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Is NATO a Pretend Alliance?

    The NATO military operation in Afghanistan is a “NATO operation” in name only. In quality and quantity, most of the forces there are from the English-speaking countries – the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Without a doubt, some NATO nations like Romania, Poland, and Denmark clearly understand how important this mission really is, especially regarding America’s future commitment to the transatlantic security alliance. In contrast, NATO heavy-weights like France and Germany are barely present and accounted for in Afghanistan. Although Paris and Berlin are happy to micromanage their national deployments in safer parts of the country, they have been reluctant to respond with support that NATO really needs – things like trainers and helicopters.

    What is disturbing about the NATO operation in Afghanistan is how smaller (and less affluent) non-NATO countries like Georgia and Macedonia are more willing to go out on a limb than France or Germany. Georgian troops are gearing up for a deployment to the south – where the majority of the action will be seen in the next few months; Macedonian troops faithfully man the front gates at the NATO headquarters in Kabul, where suicide bombers present a daily threat. These countries want to become members of NATO, but they are being blocked by the very same countries that are refusing to carry their weight in Afghanistan – specifically, France, Germany and Greece. The same kind of nearsighted parochialism that leads Paris and Berlin in particular to shirk their “shared” responsibility in Afghanistan is behind their cold shoulder toward NATO expansion.

    The United States needs a new alliance strategy, one that relies less on old, purely regional alliance structures like NATO and more on stalwart allies who are willing to pull their weight in defending freedom, and new allies who share that goal. America needs to lead a new Global Freedom Coalition that would complement NATO. We should approach freedom-loving countries all over the world that have been willing to help us fight for freedom. They, and not European countries more interested in building up the European Union than strengthening NATO, should be given pride of place in America’s international relations.

    For far too long, France, Germany and some other West European countries in NATO have been living off America’s willingness to overlook their parochialism and tendency to free ride off the United States and a few NATO stalwarts like the UK. They think they can always count on America’s pro-NATO (and even pro-European Union) policies to excuse and cover up their efforts to undermine NATO with competing EU defense policies. They know that the U.S. cares far more about the strength and integrity of NATO than they do, and thus believe they have little to worry about if they shirk their responsibilities in Afghanistan or elsewhere.

    The charade is getting old. If they are not worried about being weak and desultory members of NATO, then neither should we be. America should form new flexible alliances with countries that not only need it, but are also willing to truly share the burden of the common defense – like Poland, the Czech Republic, the UK, Australia and South Korea. We need not abandon NATO; but neither should we pretend that NATO is the an alliance whose members are all equally dedicated to the task of common defense and security–or, for that matter, is the centerpiece of America’s alliances. They are not. It’s time we admitted it.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to Is NATO a Pretend Alliance?

    1. MJF, CT says:

      It's time the United States "step to the rear" and let countries like France, Germany, Italy and others "take the point". Simply put, if you want our help, you need to put your military up front. The United States has walked the fields of Europe enough times and it's high time they stand for their own countries.

    2. Horizon3 says:

      NATO used to be a force to be reckoned with, unfortunately those days are long gone, they have devolved into just another arm of the ineffectual and corrupt UN.

    3. George, Australia says:

      They should rename NATO to Democratic Allience of Freeedom (DAOF) and countries like Greece should get kick out of the allience. Greece stole the name Macedonia in 1913 during the Balkan wars and 100 years later they (Greece) are blocking the true Macedonian state from entering NATO and EU due to concerns about territory claims made by Macedonia on the land that Greece stole in 1913.

      What makes me sick is that the EU thinks that Greece is cradle of democracy, but in the last few months the True colour of Greece has shown. 400 billion euros down the drain, corrupt and very shifty government in the last 20 years, has disputes with its neibours like Albania, Macedonia, Bulgaria and Turkey, and last they object to Kosovo's indepentent state.

      Cradle of democracy, Greece should be "cradle of shiftyness".

    4. Daversity says:

      How can we take any article that refers to France as a "heavyweight anything," seriously?

      That said–the rest of the article and comments are provocative and well stated.

      Why do we continue to bankroll the defense of feckless fools?

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×