• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Prepared for Disaster?

    Pentagon (Photo by Newscom)

    The Pentagon’s Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR), which outlines future threats to the United States, recommends cutting the number of military forces prepared to respond to a weapons-of-mass-destruction attack against America. The recommendation to downsize U.S. Northern Command personnel will expand one of three Consequence Management Response Forces (CCMRFs) while moving personnel in the other two brigade-sized forces to Homeland Response Forces in each of the 10 Federal Emergency Agency (FEMA) districts.

    In this past Monday’s Washington Examiner, Dr. James Carafano writes, “The Pentagon argues that less is actually more, because it has split the troops into smaller force packages that can get to a disaster area faster. But while smaller may be OK for small disasters, it won’t work for big ones.”

    Current Pentagon officials argue that the new set-up will improve the response time of the first CCMRF to a potential chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, or high-yield explosive attack on U.S. soil. But critics argue that the three full-size CCMRFs are necessary in the event of a WMD event.

    The Defense Department’s former homeland defense chief, Paul McHale, told Inside Defense, “If implemented as written, the QDR decision will place our country at great risk.” Senator Joe Lieberman (I-CT) also worries about losing two brigade-sized forces to 10 smaller Homeland Response Forces, which would be less effective during catastrophic attack. The QDR recommendations don’t appear to match the demands placed on these response forces to protect American citizens.

    “These troops need strong working relationships with emergency responders across the nation and the ability to deploy on short notice,” argues Carafano. “Yet, the Pentagon is pitching for less, not more — and the reason why is pretty simple. The entire review process was a rubber-stamp exercise forced to conform to budget decisions already made by — or foisted on — Gates.”

    Jeffrey Chatterton currently is a member of the Young Leaders Program at the Heritage Foundation. For more information on interning at Heritage, please visit: http://www.heritage.org/About/Internships-Young-Leaders/The-Heritage-Foundation-Internship-Program

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    One Response to Prepared for Disaster?

    1. Larry Welch, Idaho says:

      Dr Carafano implies a trust in Secretary Gates to get it right – unless. Some of us have been hopeful that Gates had the backbone to go with his insight of essential security requirements. It looks like we're both wrong.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.