• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Race to the Bargaining Table: Does Federal Grant Program Reward Unions?

    Schools in America

    Monday’s announcement that Delaware and Tennessee would win the first round of Race to the Top funds put a reality check on the grand expectations for the grant competition’s potential for true reform. While many of the first round’s 16 finalists presented applications strongly committed to the specific grant requirements outlined in the Race to the Top guidelines, Delaware and Tennessee went further to present a notably strong front of teacher union support.

    Both states garnered almost 100 percent teacher union commitment to implementing the grant proposal’s reforms. Delaware even brought the head of its teachers’ union to present the state’s Race to the Top application to the U.S. Department of Education, pushing the First State over a $100 million finish line. Many of the remaining states, however, lost points in the competition for lack of labor buy-in. Florida, for example, despite clear increases in student achievement after school choice and teacher performance pay reforms, received these comments from a Race to the Top reviewer (PDF):

    “There does not appear to be visible support from teachers or union leadership. The fact that only 8% union leaders (5 LEAs) in the participating LEAs endorsed the state’s application raises a concern about barriers that may need to be addressed by the state and at the local level.…The application does not address how the state will move forward assertively to generate union buy in. In order for Florida to ensure effective implementation of all plan criteria, teachers, along with their associations, are deemed essential especially in carrying out the RttT vision for Great Teachers and Great Leaders.”

    Lack of union support cost Florida and other first round states many of the precious 45 points allotted in Race to the Top to union, LEA, and other stakeholders buy-in.  Andy Smarick of the American Enterprise Institute asks what the seeming focus on union involvement will mean for reforms in the remaining states in round two:

    “First, Florida, Louisiana, and Rhode Island now have to wonder, “What reforms do we give up in order to get our stakeholders to support the plan? Do we lighten up on teacher evaluations? Do we give up performance pay? Do we take it easier on failing schools.” Second, and related, in other states, unions and districts may conclude that they have a veto over their states’ proposals. If a state adds an element with which they disagree, these organizations can simply say, “Unless you change that provision, we won’t sign on and you won’t win.” … the question becomes. “Which is better: a bold plan with no buy-in or a watered-down plan with buy-in?’”

    Despite some evidence pointing towards union favoritism in the scoring process, Secretary of Education, Arne Duncan, insisted (Word Document) during a press conference Monday that Race to the Top has encouraged reform-minded thinking in state leadership:

    “This is not about a pilot program or a small scale thing, this is trying to reach every single child in those states. And do it in a convincing way….”And so to see all the things that happened, 48 governors, 48 state school chiefs working to raise the bar and have higher standards for students without dumbing down expectation, to see restrictions removed in legislation and more innovation, see folks willing to challenge the status quo where things aren’t working and be not full on.”

    Challenging the status quo in American public education will take more than awarding states for victoriously racing to the union bargaining table. There are many reforms states can implement without competing for greater federal oversight or teacher union buy-in that promote increased student achievement and meaningful school choice for American families.

    Posted in Education [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to Race to the Bargaining Table: Does Federal Grant Program Reward Unions?

    1. Malo Torba says:

      Reagan is your example of presidential greatness from what I read. And you take your ideas from him and his legacy, correct?

      Didn't Reagan make ketchup a vegetable removing an actual vegetable from kid's lunches? Do you know ketchup is not a vegetable but a sugary tomato syrup?

      I was a kid then. Before Reagan, a bunch of old lunchroom ladies cooked food similar to food my granny made, not as tastey but made out of actual vegetables. Actual food. Then there was maybe two fat kids per class.

      Now days, lunchroom ladies serve nachos and pizza sticks. I guess they're vegetables too. Today, there are maybe a couple of skinny kids in each class.

      Sorry, I take your education recommendations as seriously as I take Reagan's opinion on vegetables.

    2. empaskexike says:

      I'm going to establish my personal project since there aren't any positive jobs ?n existence.

      Can anybody provide any tips or web pages as to how to get government grant money to start my personal small business? I have been previously looking over the internet but almost every web-site asks for money and I have been told by the unemployment office to avoid the sites that request money for grant related information because they are scam. I'd personally be really thankful for any help.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×