• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • What Exactly is the Deal Between President Obama and the Kremlin?

    The White House Fact Sheet on the New START Treaty agreed to between President Barack Obama and Russian President Dmitri Medvedev claims:

    No Constraints on Missile Defense and Conventional Strike: The Treaty does not contain any constraints on testing, development or deployment of current or planned U.S. missile defense programs or current or planned United States long-range conventional strike capabilities.

    But the Kremlin seems to be under the opposite impression. Vladimir Radyuhin reports:

    Russia hailed a new nuclear arms treaty with the United States, but warned that U.S. missile defence plans could derail its implementation.

    The Kremlin confirmed that Presidents Medvedev and Barack Obama would sign the treaty in Prague on April 8. However, it disputed the U.S. claim that the treaty imposed no restrictions on the U.S. missile defence programmes.

    The Russian statement said the treaty contained a “legally binding linkage between strategic offensive and strategic defensive weapons”.

    “Trust but verify” was Ronald Reagan’s approach to relations with the Soviet Union. The Senate should keep that phrase in mind when working with the Obama administration while deciding whether or not the should ratify this agreement.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    10 Responses to What Exactly is the Deal Between President Obama and the Kremlin?

    1. Eric Olson says:

      This gave light to O's good move with room left for negotiation. I hope both sides come to such conclusion!

    2. Eric Olson says:

      Did this work?!!!

    3. Eric Olson, home says:

      Did it?

    4. Akdoc says:

      Is this a new treaty born since BHO's presidency or is this a carry over from the Bush Administration?

      • Brandon Stewart Brandon Stewart says:

        Thanks for the question, Akdoc. This is a new treaty. The first START treaty was signed by the first Bush administration, but that expired on December 5, 2009.

    5. Billie says:

      I'm wondering if these two aren't just a stage show?

    6. Pingback: All Research | The Heritage Foundation | The Ruthless Truth blog

    7. Pingback: Must Know Headlines 3.30.2010 — ExposeTheMedia.com

    8. Pingback: Russia: New START Clearly Links Missile Reduction with Missile Defense | The Foundry: Conservative Policy News.

    9. Pingback: Russian Arms Agreement: You’ve Got To Be Kidding | Clarion Advisory

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×