• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Race to the Top Winners Announced

    The administration has just announced its round one Race to the Top winners, and only two states – drum roll please – Tennessee and Delaware, made the cut. The stated purpose of $4.35 billion RttT program is to increase teacher quality, improve failing schools, enhance the quality of state assessments, and build data systems to measure student growth.

    The identification of just two first-round winners falls short of the number most analysts predicted. While it is unclear as of yet exactly why those two states made the cut, the New York Times surmises:

    Tennessee has long had a student-data tracking system that allows it to trace student achievement to individual teachers, and in its proposal the state promised to adopt an advanced statewide teacher evaluation system by the 2011-12 school year. Currently, teacher evaluation systems there, as in most states, are designed by school districts.

    Delaware already has a statewide annual teacher evaluation system, and has recently adopted regulations requiring that those evaluations be based on growth in student achievement, according to the National Council on Teacher Quality, which rated the finalists’ proposals.

    Education Week made an interesting observation:

    Tennessee and Delaware just happen to be the home states of two powerful, Republican lawmakers the Obama administration is trying to court in its bipartisan push to renew the Elementary and Secondary Education Act: Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., and Rep. Mike Castle, R-Del. Both chair the subcommittees in their respective chambers dealing with K-12 policy, and both are considered leading moderate voices on education who have worked well with Democrats in the past. In fact, in an interview with the Washington Post’s David Broder, Secretary Duncan singled out Alexander and Castle as the two Republicans who had offered ideas that were incorporated into the administration’s ESEA blueprint.

    What distinguished the winners from other states? Florida, for example, had a strong application and was widely expected to top the list of RttT candidates. The WSJ reports on at least one factor:

    The administration appeared to put a very high value on applications that had won wide support from unions and school boards within their states. Florida’s bid, for instance, received the support of just 8% of its unions.

    In that respect, for all its talk of reform, RttT still seems tied to significant elements of the status quo, as Dr. Jay Greene explains:

    If people know that union opposition scuttles a state’s chances, then no state will apply in the future unless they have union support. This means that the unions will dictate what reforms will be pursued, which means that there will be virtually no reform. This enhancement of union power also undermines the rhetorical effects that RTTT had by narrowing state and local policy debate to those measures acceptable to the unions.

    Posted in Education [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to Race to the Top Winners Announced

    1. Billie says:

      Increase teacher quality? That comes from within the person that takes the title, teacher! improve failing schools? People who have the will to improve, will do it at no cost! enhance the quality of state assessments? In what way? and build data systems to measure student growth? What is wrong with the data system currently being used? This is a set-up for one set of national indoctrination fit for all. No more individual, free thinking minds, no personal achievement, no opportunities to live free in America… there'll be plenty of brainless, government jobs available now that obama has destroyed career opportunities and private businesses!

    2. Ken, California says:

      This may sound cynical, but only two states got money because of the educrats anticipated whine at the "unfairness." That whine will allow Obama-Duncan-Jennings to begin a chant among the losers for more money and another round of evaluations and bids, so THEY get some too. It's somewhat predictable. State and institutional school systems are always in the hunt for a grant, gift or bigger budget. $667 billion [$13,000] per enrolled child per year of tax payer money just doesn't cut it with these "professionals."

    3. Concerned, Mequon WI says:

      The rest of us in the private sectors are evaluated by our performance. Teachers – especially teachers who mold our children future – should be no different. We only have the unions to blame for "bad" teachers that are kept in the system. Job performance should not even be negotiable with any job with unions.

    4. Tim AZ says:

      Just another nice sounding title for another dirty deed against the American people. The cruelty of liberalism knows no bounds.

    5. one eyed okie eldora says:

      every time i see obama, it makes me sick. he has told, as we say here, so many lies, no one can depend on what he says. they think he`s doing it again

      one eyed okie.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.