• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Carbon Companies Lose Too Much Value

    From the New York Times Green, Inc Blog:

    The banking giant HSBC removed two companies involved in carbon trading from its Climate Change Index on Monday because they had lost too much value. Analysts from HSBC said the cause was mainly that governments had failed to come up with a timetable for a global climate deal at the United Nations summit in Copenhagen in December. “Carbon trading was the major loser from Copenhagen,” HSBC analysts said in their March 2010 Quarterly Index Review. ‘Cap and trade needs hard targets and binding rules – and Copenhagen delivered neither,’ HSBC said.”

    In 2007 HSBC created a Global Climate Change Benchmark Index and had four climate change indices, two of which include a Climate Change Index and a HSBC Low Carbon Energy Production Index (including: solar, wind, biofuels, geothermal). An HSBC press statement reads: “In creating these indices, HSBC has responded to changing investor sentiment in global equity markets. The HSBC research team has looked at a wide range of stocks and identified approximately 300 companies that are well positioned to benefit from the challenges of climate change.”

    This is the big problem of the government creating false expectations. Businesses were convinced that the federal government would continue its trek to regulate CO2 and subsequently prepared for a carbon-constrained future by building business models around it. HSBC’s Global Climate Change Benchmark Index is just one example. Companies, especially in energy-intensive industries, began to prepare to comply with regulations, adjust to higher prices and adapt their operations to reduce CO2. Energy producers became vested stakeholders and lobbied for handouts to produce CO2-free energy to capitalize on their own investments and reap the benefits of government handouts. Major oil companies invested in renewable energy technology to capitalize on subsidies and tax breaks while enhancing their image. Even industries that do not emit relatively large mount of CO2 had to prepare for higher energy costs as well as be more cognizant of its own carbon output.

    The regulations have certainly taken longer to put in place (or may not come into place at all) than many of these companies thought and it’s beginning to show. After Copenhagen failed, both procedurally and in its attempts to create a treaty, carbon prices fell dramatically on the European Climate Exchange in London. Government action and inaction is hurting businesses and consumers on all fronts. Government action would result in draconian energy taxes that would be passed onto the consumer – not just in gasoline and electricity consumption – but all producers that would face higher electricity prices. Government inaction is not only resulting in failing carbon markets but also creating business uncertainty. With potentially looming higher energy costs, businesses are hesitating on investing in new capital and labor. Leave it to the government to stunt the economic recovery without passing legislation; of course, passing a bill that regulates carbon dioxide will only make it worse.

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to Carbon Companies Lose Too Much Value

    1. Pingback: All Research | The Heritage Foundation | The Ruthless Truth blog

    2. Don Morton Ballwin,M says:

      While Global Warming is debated, the relationship of CO2 as a cause of warming, has never been proven. In fact, evidence of CO2 as a result of warming is more logical than it being a cause To reshape our entire energy policy on a faulty scientific conclusion is very dangerous. This seems to be about power and money.

    3. Todd Wynn says:

      What do you expect with a highly manipulated and regulated market?

      The other part to this whole carbon trading madness is the concept of carbon offsets.

      For the past year I have been researching into the Bonneville Environmental Foundation’s(BEF) carbon offset scheme. BEF is known as one of the nation's leading carbon offset providers in the nation. This audit accompanies the audit on Oregon’s carbon offset provider, the Climate Trust. Both audits highlight the scam of carbon offsets.

      The full in-depth audit can be found here: http://cascadepolicy.org/pdf/20100324ClimateSwind

      I have also finished a summary document that describes the issues with carbon offsets here: http://www.cascadepolicy.org/2010/03/26/the-clima

      Even the Federal Trade Commission, which investigates cases of market deception, warns that carbon offsets carry a high risk of fraud, yet all climate policies introduced on the state and national level call for the use of carbon offsets.

      It is a serious issue that could lead to billions of dollars wasted in projects that do nothing to little for the environment.

    4. Bob Goldenthal, West says:

      Regulating CO2, which is roughly 350 parts per million in the atmosphere – going to 400 or 450 due to increasing CO2 pollution due to the industrial revolution and mankind's activities, is worrying about a very small phenomenon. Put into dollar terms, it's as if the earth's atmosphere is $1,000 (or 100,000 cents) and we're worrying about 35 cents going to 40 or 45 cents. In other words, it's nickel and dime stuff. Totally off base and irrational. What a colossal waste of effort by so called scientists.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×