• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Founding Fathers Never Intended Courts to Make National Security Decisions

    Yesterday  Attorney General Eric Holder announced that the Obama Justice Department would appeal a U.S. District Court Judge James Robertson’s order to release 9/11 terrorist operative Mohamedou Ould Slahi.

    This is a good decision by Holder. Our nation would be less safe if Slahi was released from U.S. custody. But the very need for the appeal underscores how the Obama administration’s larger approach to detainee treatment is seriously undermining our national security. Former Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York and current National Review Institute senior fellow Andrew McCarthy explains:

    The courts are institutionally incompetent when it comes to matters of national security, particularly the prosecution of war.

    The Framers intended it that way. National-security decisions are the most important ones a political community makes, so our system of government was designed to have them made by the political branches — by those who answer to the voters, to the people whose lives are at stake. When the political branches abdicate this first responsibility of government, sitting by as it is usurped by politically insulated judges, they deny us the freedom to decide for ourselves what our security requires. We are then the subjects of judges rather than masters of our own destiny.

    Now, we’ve somehow made it the job of Judge James Robertson, a progressive civil-rights activist appointed to the bench by President Clinton in 1994. Robertson is the district judge who started it all, the first to rule — back in 2003 — that Salim Hamdan, Osama bin Laden’s personal bodyguard and driver, had Geneva Convention rights and could not be subjected to a military-commission trial. He later quit the FISA court in apparent protest over the president’s wartime effort to penetrate our enemies’ international communications without asking permission from federal judges. Now, he is ready to spring Slahi, the terrorist who set 9/11 in motion.

    Mohamedou Ould Slahi and Judge Robertson are exactly why Heritage fellow Cully Stimson has been calling for the President and Congress to establish “a durable, long-term, and sustainable framework for legal detention, not just for detainees currently at Guantanamo, but for future high-value captures outside of Afghanistan.” The Judiciary is just the wrong body to be making these key national security decisions.

    Posted in Legal [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Founding Fathers Never Intended Courts to Make National Security Decisions

    1. Gnostic, U.S.A. says:

      You couldn't be more wrong and I speak from 1st hand knowledge. Slahi is currently no more a threat to the U.S. than you or I are. Slahi and others should be given asylum in the US under witness protection program. He and others have helped the US cause in the war on terror more than you can possibly imagine.

    2. Charles Martel, Flor says:

      One good decision by Holder, out of how many?

    3. gorio, calif. says:

      Gnostic's comment illuminates the "moral dillima" that this government refuses to address. Because an "enemy combatant didn't actually have American blood dripping from his/her hands, aren't they morally equivalent to an American gang banger? Should we treat them any different than our catch and release policy on

      illegal aliens? In the morally murkey world of our current progressive bureauocrats there is no distinction they can see, The morality and the rules are supposed to change with ones emotional reactions and other "VITAL" factors. They NEVER have been grounded in the rule of LAW, only in the rule of the "leader". This is why we have the "commissions" simply to obscure and provide cover for the "real" government action which usually is to do nothing. Progressives are simply incompetent to make decisions on national defense,OOPS!!! WHAT HAVE WE DONE? WHAT IS HE DOING NOW?

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.