• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • The New York Times and Missile Defense

    Yesterday, The New York Times ran an editorial titled “Fixing Missile Defense.” Given the editors’ clear track record of opposing missile defense, they must mean “fix” it in the sense of neutering it.  Ostensibly, the editors are pointing to recent public complaints by the Director of the Missile Defense Agency about poor quality-control practices by several unidentified defense contractors.  Predictably, the editorial calls for punishing the contractors.

    What is important here, however, is that the criticism does not stop there.  The editorial also warns against adopting a missile defense testing program that produces a long string of successes.  This warning has merit if it is intended to prevent the missile defense program from failing to advance the technology.  It does not have merit, however, if it is designed to result in some number of test failures only as a means for justifying the termination the program.  All weapons development programs that seek to advance the level of technology will experience failures from time to time.  In many cases, more can be learned from test failures than successes.

    In the end, The New York Times editorialists are offering their criticisms of missile defense in bad faith.  Simultaneously, they want the missile defense program to follow a testing regime that both increases the risk of an occasional failure and punishes the program for a failure by terminating it.  Clearly, the criticism is offered with only the goal of termination in mind.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    One Response to The New York Times and Missile Defense

    1. Pingback: Will The New START Undermine Our Nuclear Security? « A Nation ADrift-Why?

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.