• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • A Guide to the Senate Vote-o-Rama: Part One

    Senator Harry Reid (D-NV)

    The Senate’s health care bill became law earlier this week, but that does not mean the fight against a government overhaul of our nation’s health system is over.  This week, the Senate will consider amendments to the reconciliation bill passed by the House alongside the Senate health bill, H.R. 3590.  This process will provide a chance to ameliorate the numerous shortcomings of the passed legislation, and will provide Americans with a glimpse at the true intentions of their elected officials as they are forced to take a stance on difficult questions regarding changes to the bill.  Here, we outline some of the amendments put forth and the Senate’s verdict:

    Protecting Medicare Savings. Senator Judd Gregg (R-NH) offered an amendment to protect new savings from Medicare from being used to fund new entitlements.  The passed legislation and the reconciliation package would create a combined $529 billion in cuts to Medicare spending over ten years.  Lawmakers claim these cuts will be applied to increase the program’s solvency, which will otherwise cause $38 trillion in unfunded liabilities to the taxpayers. Unfortunately, this is unlikely to be the case: proponents of the bill tried to have it both ways by double counting savings from Medicare, but according to the Congressional Budget Office, “…the savings to the HI trust fund under the PPACA would be received by the government only once, so they cannot be set aside to pay for future Medicare spending and, at the same time, pay for current spending on other parts of the legislation or on other programs.”  Sen. Gregg’s amendment would have ensured prolonged fiscal sustainability of Medicare; however, the Senate voted to table the amendment with a vote of 56-42.

    Getting Rid of Special Deals. When President Obama took office, he promised to introduce transparency to the legislative process.  Instead, the White House and congressional leadership resorted to backroom deals and shady tactics to pass the monumentally unpopular health care bill.  Senator John McCain (R-AZ) offered an amendment that would remove all the sweetheart deals added to lure needed votes for the bill.  These include, but are not limited to, increases in Medicaid Disproportionate Share Hospital payments for Tennessee and Hawaii, the “Louisiana Purchase”, Medicare coverage for Libby, Montana residents exposed to environmental hazards, and $100 million for hospitals in Connecticut.  Sen. McCain’s amendment was tabled with a vote of 54-43, leaving taxpayers to foot the bill for these special deals used to pass legislation they didn’t like in the first place.

    Removing Taxes on the Middle Class. Another of the President’s campaign promises was that he would not increase taxes on individuals making under $200,000 or families making $250,000.  But the health bill the President signed this week carries with it a handful of new taxes that would affect all Americans, regardless of income, including a penalty for failure to purchase a government-approved health plan, taxes on high-cost insurance plans, and taxes on medical necessities such as prescription drugs and medical devices.  Senator Mike Crapo (R-ID) offered a motion to commit the health bill to the Finance committee to ensure that it met the President’s promise not to increase taxes on the middle class.  The Senate voted to table this amendment with a vote of 56-43.

    Protecting Jobs and the Economy. The health bill includes an employer mandate that will punish employers for failing to offer insurance to their workers.  The unintended consequences of this provision will be multitudinous: it will encourage employers to avoid hiring low-income workers, it will encourage employers who must hire a high proportion of low-income workers to drop the coverage they currently offer, and it will result in loss of jobs and lower wages.  To combat this, Senator Mike Enzi (R-WY) offered a motion to commit the bill to the Finance Committee to strike the employer mandate and replace it with other offsets.  The Senate voted 58-41 to table this amendment.

    Preventing Premium Increases. Our nation’s health care system faces out-of-control growth in health spending, and will continue to do so after enactment of the liberals’ health care package.  The bill does nothing to bend the cost curve, instead increasing total national health expenditures.  Moreover, provisions in the bill such as federally-mandated benefits and the combination of guaranteed access to insurance with an individual mandate that is significantly less expensive than a health plan, will cause premiums to rise.  CBO has found that H.R.3590 would increase premiums in the individual market by as much as 13 percent, and the effects expected by our analysts are even more severe.  Senator John Barrasso (R-WY) offered an amendment requiring that no provisions in the bill would result in premium increases—this amendment was tabled with a vote of 57-41.

    Subjecting Lawmakers to Obamacare. The President has indicated that the care Americans will receive under his health care package will rival the popular Federal Employee Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) through which members of Congress and other federal employees purchase insurance.  Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA) offered an amendment which would force proponents of the package to put this claim to the test by requiring that the President and all members of Congress and their staff receive health care through the newly-created exchanges rather than through the FEHBP.  Was the Senate willing to take the plunge?  It appears not—the amendment failed by a vote of 56-43.

    Posted in Obamacare [slideshow_deploy]

    6 Responses to A Guide to the Senate Vote-o-Rama: Part One

    1. james bloomington il says:

      In four years how can we treat 30 million people who are going to flood the health care system.there is no incentive for are young people to become doctors.

      what about all the all the people in mexico that cross are borders.will they be insured? they will because someone wants there vote.

    2. RG Bud, Nebraska says:

      As usual you guys are right on top of it. You can really tell from the votes above that the Democrats didn't want to have anything to do with the meaningful amendments presented by the opposing party.

    3. Carolyn, New Hampshi says:

      I'm appalled at the extremely partisan nature of those votes. These were all common sense proposals, many of which reflected the president's own requirements. Just shows that the Democrats aren't concerned about the welfare of the citizens, only with their own power and privilege.

    4. Ed, Minnesota says:

      This is an excellent summary – and this HealthCare law looks like a great deal. Much the the speculation contained within this summary is just that – "the sky is falling" speculation. The handful of taxes are quite meager. An excise tax on beer and soda pop. Big deal. A minor increase in Medicare withdrawal if you earn over $200K per year. Again yawn. The Hospital and Medical insurance industries are big business in the country. As a capitalist and investor – I for one am in favor of introducing more citizens to the rewards of dealing with the big business of medical care. Better for our bottom line as a nation. Better healthcare translates to keeping educated experienced workers in the workplace and results in better productivity and wages – and thus taxes collected. Would have liked to see our Congress put themselves into the plan. That is the only concrete negative that I can see.

    5. Terry, NE says:

      They should have just made an amendment that said any tax or fee that is associated with this bill is null and void if you make less then $200,000.

    6. tomo bensalem pa. says:

      I am retired,61YR. old total income $13,000.Minus$ 7,200.00 SS thats not required to report.What expence will be applied to me ?

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.