• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Tehran's Terrible Future, and Maybe America's Too

    It was a sobering read. In 1950, Samuel Glasstone’s “The Effects of Atomic Weapons” provided the first unclassified explanation of the physical destruction caused by nuclear weapons. The book’s descriptions were detailed, clinically precise … and terrifying.

    For decades, it remained the authoritative source on the topic. Only one problem: It wasn’t always right. Take this conclusion: “The shock wave produced by an air-burst atomic bomb is the most important agent in producing destruction. …”

    For years, military planners used that insight to estimate the scope of destruction wrought by a mushroom cloud. They were way off.

    In “Whole World on Fire” (2003), Lynn Eden argues that focusing on shock waves led planners to significantly underestimate the destructive power of atomic warfare because they didn’t take into account the damage done by mass fire.

    Analysts had concluded it was difficult to predict the effects of fire and, because it was only a secondary agent of destruction, they simply omitted fire from their calculations.

    Big mistake, Eden says. Recent research suggests that nuclear weapons are much more destructive than previously thought because of the effect of mass fire. At the moment of detonation, the heart of an atomic fireball is four to five times hotter than the sun. It generates a firestorm of hurricane-force winds. Air temperature soars above the boiling point.

    Both Washington and Tehran have much to learn from this. The people of Iran should realize the terrible price they may pay due to their president’s relentless pursuit of nuclear weapons. For Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, nukes are more than a status symbol. He views them as a useful tool. He publicly yearns to bring about the “death of Israel” and live in “a world without America.”

    Nukes are the way to reach these goals. Give this delusional dreamer a nuclear weapon and a missile to deliver it, and he’ll be only too eager to threaten his enemies with nuclear holocaust.

    That, of course, would only invite atomic retaliation … the type that would obliterate Iran. Ahmadinejad is an existential threat to his own people. And that’s reason enough for Iranians to take back their country.

    The lesson for Washington is that the United States, a long-established nuclear power, must act like a responsible one. President Obama has started a mad dash down the “road to zero” — with the announced goal of eliminating our nuclear arsenal. It’s a path more likely to end in a nuclear firestorm than in peace.

    Why? The danger starts with the administration’s refusal to fully modernize our nuclear weapons. Our aging inventory is increasingly less usable and reliable. The continuing erosion of a credible deterrent force will only invite aggression.

    Moreover, slashing U.S. arsenals may well spur a news arms race. It may encourage emerging atomic enemies such as Iran and North Korea to “pick up the pace” to become our nuclear equals. That in turn could spark other nations wary of these rogue regimes to fast-track their own nuclear programs. Instead of easing tensions, our nuclear drawdown could ratchet up worldwide instability.

    The administration has compounded its nuclear error by hobbling our missile defense program. War gaming exercises consistently show missile defenses not only deter attacks, they deter others from even building up their arsenals. Why build missiles when they’ll just be shot down?

    A world on fire is horrific vision of the future. The Iranian administration views it as glorious, while our administration steadfastly averts its gaze. It should worry peace-loving Iranians and Americans alike.

    Cross-posted at The Examiner.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to Tehran's Terrible Future, and Maybe America's Too

    1. Michael, TX says:

      While I agree with you main points, it will take a long long time for Iran or the DPRK to catch up to the American arsenal even if we start massive cuts. Obama will never succeed in total nuclear disarmament. While I don't support any such cuts, we shouldn't act like we are a blink of an eye away from nuclear balance between these states and the U.S.

      And yes, missile defense needs to be further developed and deployed.

    2. Lloyd S. Pedersen 20 says:

      Pass a federal law that forces children to salute the flag and pledge alligance to the flag everv day or morning in the class room. Also teach the national history as a cerriculam or mandate requirement for graduation in high school at least for two years. Otherwise the student will not receive a diploma at graduation.

      Thamk You!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    3. Lloyd S. Pedersen 20 says:

      Note: The reason that the past five generations of people graduating from public schools are brain washed today is thst they do not know any United States history and they are not true Americans.

    4. Billie says:

      I appreciate your article, James. It's important to address all angles, especially in this " man-made" ugly world.

      "Man-made" are those men of no human qualities, using their brains to destroy the freedoms and peace of all mankind.

    5. Dale Cord says:

      Freedom,Peace? What planet have you been living on? Who ever wrote the line that one of the characters on Star Trek said,really hit the nail squarely on the head: "BEAM ME UP…..I FIND NO INTELLIGENT LIFE ON THIS PLANET" One thing for sure,that the human race will have left once it has destroyed it's self is an epitaph that will read: " A planet that was once inhabited by the enemies of their Creator, and now hangs as a cold and desolate rock in a Universe of the same,

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×