• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Health Coverage for All Americans? Not Under the Senate Health Bill

    As Congressional leaders continue to search for ways to pass the Senate health bill in the House later this week, Americans continue to be subjected to dubious rhetoric surrounding the bill’s provisions.  The Senate bill’s supporters claim that their legislation must be made law, no matter the cost, in order to achieve universal coverage in the United States.  However, even if the Senate bill does pass, this will not be the case.  Despite the fact that the proposed legislation is exorbitantly expensive, it would still fail to achieve universal health coverage.

    According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), by 2019, the legislation would cost (PDF) $196 billion annually and still leave 24 million Americans uninsured.

    The fact that 24 million people remain would uninsured with enactment of the Senate health bill is remarkable. Under current law, there would be 55 million uninsured Americans in 2019.  That means that over 43 percent of the projected uninsured would be unaffected by the legislation, continuing to go without coverage ten years from now.  Yet according to research by Heritage expert James Capretta, the bill would cost well over $1 trillion over the next ten years.  Capretta shows that the true ten year cost of the plan is more likely to be close to $1.2 trillion, but even this estimate significantly underestimates the true long term cost of the plan.  Capretta further points out that this estimate includes ten years of new revenues, but only 6 or 7 years of new spending, skewing the Congressional Budget Office’s ten-year cost analysis to make the bill appear less expensive than it really is.  He says  that a  true ten year estimate would put the price tag closer to $2.3 trillion.

    Congressional leaders claim that the cost is justified because the bill extends health care coverage to 31 million uninsured Americans.  It depends on what one means by “coverage”. Much of the  increased coverage would come in the form of Medicaid expansion, as well as exchange subsidies. But Medicaid is characterized by  low-quality care and it often fails to meet the health needs of its beneficiaries.   According to recent analysis by Heritage Health Policy Fellow Brian Blase, Medicaid expansion in Tennessee actually decreased the quality of care relative to surrounding states that did not expand their own Medicaid programs.  In the four years after expanding Medicaid, Tennessee’s improvements in general mortality were more than 50 percent lower than its neighbors. In many states, Medicaid beneficiaries end up in the hospital emergency rooms because they can’t find a doctor who’ll take artificially low Medicaid payment rates.  Clearly, Medicaid is not a vehicle for improving the quality of care for millions of Americans. And coverage without efficient access to medical services is probably not what ordinary Americans have in mind when it comes to health care reform.

    If the highly unpopular health care legislation is going to cost taxpayers over $196 billion annually ten years from now, while leaving an estimated  24 million Americans without coverage, perhaps that is yet another reason why Congress ought to pause, come to its senses, and press the re-set button. Americans expect and deserve better.

    Rick Sherwood currently is a member of the Young Leaders Program at the Heritage Foundation. For more information on interning at Heritage, please visit:http://www.heritage.org/about/departments/ylp.cfm

    Posted in Obamacare [slideshow_deploy]

    7 Responses to Health Coverage for All Americans? Not Under the Senate Health Bill

    1. Billie says:

      There are too many simple solutions. The government continues to complicate and dangerously… taking on expense where the people should be responsible for the freedom and health they allow themselves.

    2. Pingback: Find Out More Helpful Info About Car Insurance | Get Car insurance quotes online

    3. Dennis Social Circle says:

      WHEN DID THE DEMS AND OBAMA GET THE AUTHORITY TO TELL US WE MUST HAVE HEALTH CARE? WHY SHOULD I BE FORCED TO PAY FOR SOMEONE THAT DOES NOT WANT OR CARE ABOUT A JOB OR PAYING THEIR BILLS? IT IS PAST TIME THE HANDOUTS OF OTHERS HARD EARNED MONEY STOP.

    4. Erich Harrold Calfor says:

      27.

      WHEN WILL EVERYONE REALIZE, THIS ONGOING CONSPIRACY (for over 100 yrs) IS COMING TO FRUITION FOR THE "PROGRESSIVES" !

      Distract, divide, all are ploys of the “Progressives”! They are rife in both parties and they have the same goals. COMPLETE CONTROL to turn this republic into an OLIGARCHY.

      OUR APATHY has allowed them to use our tax monies to fund their agenda and with this HealthCare legislation they will have us so bound and restricted it will turn our lives into

      government SLAVES. I hope to God we have not waited TOO LONG to stop this total

      SUBVERSION OF OUR CONSTITUTION.

    5. Pingback: An update on the Democrats’ Healthcare Reform Bill Fast Shuffle and the Big B Files’ Responses to McCaskill’s Reply « Big B Files

    6. Arnold Benton City W says:

      With all the hype about passing this bill, why cant they tell the average person what the bill will do? I have listened to the arguments for two days now and still dont know anything about what its about.

    7. Dallas dee says:

      I, like many I know, feel that we would rather go to Pelosi's prison than pay for someone else's healthcare. Most of these ppl that dont have healthcare dont have a job, so, where is the money going to come from? Instead of building hospitals for all the MILLIONS on uninsured Americans that will now be "covered" they better start thinking about builfing more prisons…..

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×