<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A History of Insisting: Abortion and the House of Representatives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.heritage.org/2010/03/12/a-history-of-insisting-abortion-and-the-house-of-representatives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2010/03/12/a-history-of-insisting-abortion-and-the-house-of-representatives/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:06:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen Kuznicki, Hawks</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2010/03/12/a-history-of-insisting-abortion-and-the-house-of-representatives/#comment-95867</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen Kuznicki, Hawks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 06:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=28738#comment-95867</guid>
		<description>Stupak hasn&#039;t any problems with the rest of the bill.  I believe he will cave in the end, either by saying what he said at a Cheboygan Town Hall last year, &quot;I tried,&quot; or by accepting assurances that this will all be settled during, &quot;reconciliation&quot; (his favorite word.)   
 
The last major news report on Stupak has him saying the words, &#8220;Money is their hang-up. Is this how we now value life in America? If money is the issue &#8212; come on, we can find room in the budget. This is life  we&#8217;re talking about.&#8221; 
 
Very different than the words he used at the Tawas Town Hall to explain to a supporter his rationalization of the abortion issue v. 45,000 deaths due to no health care. 
 
&quot;Q7-  I was wondering how you derive the dichotomy between the 450,000 people that would die annually without health care, and abortion?  How do you deal with that? 
 
S- How do I deal with it?  45,000 people each year die because they lack health insurance and access to medical care um, they are born, they are into this country, they had an opportunity at life, how do you deny someone that right?  So, I think it&#8217;s consistent. 
 
This bill, I&#8217;ll probably get a couple of people cranked at me, this bill is really a Right to Life Bill.  If you are having a child right now, what do you get on Medicaid?  You get 2 appointments before the child is born and one after, and that&#8217;s our prenatal health care, which most babies are born on right now. 
 
So, I think this bill is a pro-life bill, it promotes preventive, healthy living, it promotes healthy babies being born. 
 
Audience member- What bill are you talking about? 
 
S- House bill. 
 
Audience member-  But that&#8217;s not in play right now. 
 
S- Yeah, it&#8217;s still in play, the Senate can pass it tomorrow if they wanted to, but they don&#8217;t want to, they wrote their own bill.&quot; 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://jennerationx.com/2010/03/stupaks-town-hall-in-tawas-michigan/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://jennerationx.com/2010/03/stupaks-town-hall...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stupak hasn&#039;t any problems with the rest of the bill.  I believe he will cave in the end, either by saying what he said at a Cheboygan Town Hall last year, &quot;I tried,&quot; or by accepting assurances that this will all be settled during, &quot;reconciliation&quot; (his favorite word.)  </p>
<p>The last major news report on Stupak has him saying the words, &ldquo;Money is their hang-up. Is this how we now value life in America? If money is the issue &mdash; come on, we can find room in the budget. This is life  we&rsquo;re talking about.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Very different than the words he used at the Tawas Town Hall to explain to a supporter his rationalization of the abortion issue v. 45,000 deaths due to no health care.</p>
<p>&quot;Q7-  I was wondering how you derive the dichotomy between the 450,000 people that would die annually without health care, and abortion?  How do you deal with that?</p>
<p>S- How do I deal with it?  45,000 people each year die because they lack health insurance and access to medical care um, they are born, they are into this country, they had an opportunity at life, how do you deny someone that right?  So, I think it&rsquo;s consistent.</p>
<p>This bill, I&rsquo;ll probably get a couple of people cranked at me, this bill is really a Right to Life Bill.  If you are having a child right now, what do you get on Medicaid?  You get 2 appointments before the child is born and one after, and that&rsquo;s our prenatal health care, which most babies are born on right now.</p>
<p>So, I think this bill is a pro-life bill, it promotes preventive, healthy living, it promotes healthy babies being born.</p>
<p>Audience member- What bill are you talking about?</p>
<p>S- House bill.</p>
<p>Audience member-  But that&rsquo;s not in play right now.</p>
<p>S- Yeah, it&rsquo;s still in play, the Senate can pass it tomorrow if they wanted to, but they don&rsquo;t want to, they wrote their own bill.&quot;</p>
<p>  <a href="http://jennerationx.com/2010/03/stupaks-town-hall-in-tawas-michigan/" rel="nofollow">http://jennerationx.com/2010/03/stupaks-town-hall&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Stupak: Dems Told Me Funding Abortion Is Good, Because Kids Are Costly&#8221; and related posts &#124; Socialinks</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2010/03/12/a-history-of-insisting-abortion-and-the-house-of-representatives/#comment-95573</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Stupak: Dems Told Me Funding Abortion Is Good, Because Kids Are Costly&#8221; and related posts &#124; Socialinks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=28738#comment-95573</guid>
		<description>[...] A History of Insisting: Abortion and the House of Representatives - The Foundry: Conservative Policy News. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A History of Insisting: Abortion and the House of Representatives - The Foundry: Conservative Policy News. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billie</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2010/03/12/a-history-of-insisting-abortion-and-the-house-of-representatives/#comment-95511</link>
		<dc:creator>Billie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 02:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=28738#comment-95511</guid>
		<description>again, individual people are in control of their personal behavior. Why are the taxpayers held accountable for the consequences of personal behavior?  
 
And WHY are they SO insistent on implementing this ugly, immoral, provision. They devalue human life so much, who knows what will happen to penalties of murder. Oh wait, I guess we already know their favoring of terrorists and of course, this abortion provision. Something smells worse then it is... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>again, individual people are in control of their personal behavior. Why are the taxpayers held accountable for the consequences of personal behavior? </p>
<p>And WHY are they SO insistent on implementing this ugly, immoral, provision. They devalue human life so much, who knows what will happen to penalties of murder. Oh wait, I guess we already know their favoring of terrorists and of course, this abortion provision. Something smells worse then it is&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John, Cincinnati</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2010/03/12/a-history-of-insisting-abortion-and-the-house-of-representatives/#comment-95489</link>
		<dc:creator>John, Cincinnati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=28738#comment-95489</guid>
		<description>I think out of respect it&#039;s important to note that Steve Chabot is a former Congressman (7 terms), this was not noted in the article. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think out of respect it&#039;s important to note that Steve Chabot is a former Congressman (7 terms), this was not noted in the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

