• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Keeping Chinese Investment in Perspective

    Discussion of Chinese investment in the United States usually focuses on U.S. government bonds held by China’s State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE). While SAFE directs the majority of Chinese investment in the United States, including all China’s bond purchases, it plays very little role in non-bond investment. The China Investment Corporation (CIC) is the sovereign wealth fund responsible for allocating a portion of China’s foreign exchange reserves through non-bond investments. Indeed, CIC activities have accounted for more than 80% of Chinese non-bond investment in the U.S. since it was established in 2007.

    As a sovereign wealth fund, CIC is a tool of the state and Americans have reason to be wary that its motives are not entirely commercial. CIC officers often attempt to discredit such claims. Last October, chairman Lou Jiwei dismissed the notion that CIC is pursuing anything beyond good returns. “What national strategy?” he asked. “Our strategy is long-term risk-adjusted returns.” Judging from the 13F form that CIC disclosed to the Securities and Exchange Commission in February and the Heritage Foundation’s China Global Investment Tracker, it appears that neither side is entirely correct. CIC certainly is a political as well as commercial instrument, but it does not aim to acquire strategic American assets nor gain substantial corporate influence in the U.S.

    While CIC does own stock in iconic American companies like Apple, Coca-Cola, and Motorola, its shares in each are insignificant, worth less than $10 million. CIC has only made two first-time investments over $100 million in American companies since 2007: $100 million in Visa’s IPO and $1.58 billion in power company AES. All the rest of CIC’s large investments in the U.S. have gone into financial products, like $3.2 billion in a J.C. Flowers Fund in April, 2008 and two $600 million investments in distressed asset funds through Oaktree Capital and Goldman Sachs in September, 2009.

    CIC is a prolific investor in Chinese companies, usually through Hong Kong-listed companies of mainland origin. Until recently, all of CIC’s large investments outside China and Hong Kong occurred in the U.S. and most were in the financial services sector. Since June, CIC has begun diversifying geographically. Of its 14 investments over $100 million in 2009, seven were made outside the U.S.. Most notably it paid $1.5 billion for a 17% stake in Teck Resources, a Canadian mining and minerals company.

    Fears about China using CIC to achieve political goals in the U.S. seem unfounded. CIC bolstered the American financial sector when fresh capital was in short supply. And it has become a fairly conservative investor, choosing low-risk investments and diversifying into multiple sectors and countries. As Andrew Peaple put it in a recent Wall Street Journal article: “So much for the big bad wolf…. China Investment Corp. has revealed itself to be more like Little Red Riding Hood’s grandmother.”

    Olivia Killeen  is currently a member of the Young Leaders Program at the Heritage Foundation. For more information on interning at Heritage, please visit: http://www.heritage.org/about/departments/ylp.cfm

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    One Response to Keeping Chinese Investment in Perspective

    1. D Murphy says:

      Given all that is going on politically in the US with todays congressional decisions, would investing in China and its currency make sense? My concern is the nationalizing of US 401K programs ( not announced but discussed) so an alternative would be something I would want to understand in a country that is moving up.

      Your thoughts are appreciated.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×