• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Dropout Crisis Prompts Federal Reach into Schools

    President Barack Obama announced Monday that $900 million in federal grants in the proposed FY 2011 budget would be available to school districts and administrators who work to transform roughly 5,000 failing school across the nation. While the proposal encourages transformation of the few thousand schools that produce half of America’s yearly 1.2 million high school dropouts, the reliance on federal government resources and direction to rescue America’s educational system falls short of true reform.

    The President’s proposal, detailed in a subsequent press release, encourages early intervention programs for students at risk of dropping out and an emphasis on college readiness programs like advanced placement courses and dual enrollment. Specific accountability measures include replacing the management and half the teaching staff of a low-performing school, closing the school, restarting a school under a charter’s management, or transforming a school through increased teacher training and support. The President went on to emphasize the role of government in reforming failing schools, while noting the part parents, teachers, and the community can play in education America’s students. He stated:

    Government has a responsibility. Government can help educate students to succeed in college and in a career. Government can help provide the resources to engage dropouts and those at risk of dropping out and, when necessary, the government has to be critically involved in turning around the lowest performing schools. …Education is not and cannot be the task of government alone. It’s going to take non-profits and businesses doing their part through alliances like America’s Promise. It will take parent’s getting involved in their child’s education consistently. Going to parent-teacher conferences, helping their children with their homework.

    While the plan announced by President Obama expressed a laudable motivation to reform failing schools and lower dropout rates, the continual dependence on federal aid and discretion for salvation from poorly performing high schools misses the heart of effective reform found most often in greater competition and parental choice. Rather than spend almost $1 billion of additional federal grants, states and school districts can encourage and implement meaningful reforms that expand access to good teachers and increase parental involvement in students’ education.

    An expansion of effective virtual schools and the use of online classrooms may address many of the concerns outlined by the President at a reduced cost to taxpayers.  Virtual schools not only increase students’ access to high quality and advanced classes and educators, they also foster the innovation that President Obama sees as integral to keeping students engaged in academics and on track to graduation.

    As the President noted, increased parental involvement in students’ education will dictate the success of any school reform effort. But rather than relegate a parent’s role to conference attendee and homework helper, why not empower families with a meaningful choice in their child’s education through school voucher programs? As demonstrated in the Washington, D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program, providing parents the ability to choose a safe and effective school for their children means better performing students. The use of voucher programs and other school choice initiatives also increases competition among schools, which may lead to a natural reformation or closure of failing schools.

    President Obama concluded his remarks by saying:

    The stakes are too high – for our children, for our economy, for our country. It’s time for all of us to come together – parents and students, principals and teachers, business leaders and elected officials – to end America’s dropout crisis.

    Agreed. All of those parties, from students to principals to representatives, should work together for effective reform that keeps money in the wallets of taxpayers and educational choice in the hands of parents and students.

    Sarah Torre is currently a member of the Young Leaders Program at the Heritage Foundation. For more information on interning at Heritage, please visit: http://www.heritage.org/about/departments/ylp.cfm

    Posted in Education [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to Dropout Crisis Prompts Federal Reach into Schools

    1. Billie says:

      Government has a responsibility. Government can help educate students to succeed in college and in a career.OBVIOUSLY GOVERNMENT CAN'''T OR THEIR WOULDN'T BE A PROBLEM WITH THE DROPOUT RATE. LET'S SEE HOW IT WORKS WITHOUT GOVERNMENT FOR A "CHANGE."

      Government can help provide the resources to engage dropouts and those at risk of dropping out and, when necessary, PROVIDE? HOW IS THAT, WHEN NO ONE HAS MONEY? I SMELL A CRISIS…

      the government has to be critically involved in turning around the lowest performing schools. MR/ PRESIDENT, IF PARENTS WANT THE SCHOOLS, THEY'LL DO IT WITHOUT TAX DOLLARS. PARENTS CAN BE VERY CREATIVE AND EFFICIENT WHEN THERE IS A WILL. ASIDE ALL THAT, IN OTHER WORDS, your child will learn through GOVERNMENT INFLUENCE. LIMITED AND INDOCTRINATING.

      Education is not and cannot be the task of government alone. SHOULDN'T BE THE TASK OF GOVERNMENT AT ALL! WHAT MAKES YOU THINK PEOPLE NEED TO HOLD YOUR HAND, WHY HAVE YOU NO FAITH IN THE PEOPLE AND THEIR IDEAS, MR. PRESIDENT? FREEDOM COMES WITHOUT GOVERNMENT! WHY DO YOU RUN TO THE RESCUE OF ALL WITHOUT RESPECTING ALL TO USE THEIR OWN INTELLIGENCE. WHY DO YOU SEE AMERICANS SO NEEDY OF YOU? IT'S INSULTING.

      I WAS REALLY "HOPING," YOU WOULD'VE BEEN RAD IN FREEDOM AND EQUALITY, HIGH INTEGRITY, HONORABLE AND TRUTHFUL TO ALL. WOULD LIFT THE WEAK TO TAKE ON THEIR LIFE'S RESPONSIBILITIES RESPECTING EVERYONE ELSE DOING THE SAME. LIVING FREE WITHOUT YOUR HAND/DEPENDENCE. AND YOU LOOKING ON, SEEING A NATION OF PEOPLE, WHO'S PASSION FOR PEACE AND CIVILITY UNITES US ALL. EVERYONE LIVING FREE IN ACCORDANCE AND ACCOUNTANCY TO THEIR LIFE'S RESPONSIBILITIES, BUT YOUR TRANSPARENCY IS OVERWHELMING.

      WE DON'T NECESSARILY HAVE EQUAL ABILITIES, MENTALLY AND PHYSICALLY. BUT WE SHOULD ALL HAVE THE FREEDOM AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY UNDER CIVIL LAW, TO USE WHAT, AS INDIVIDUALS, WE HAVE. FULFILL MY LIFE POTENTIAL NOT GOVERNMENT'S. TAKING THE NECESSARY AND EQUAL STEPS WITHIN MY MEANS, TO FULFILL, NOT GOVERNMENTS! WHAT I CHOOSE! NOT WHAT GOVERNMENT CHOOSES FOR ME.

      It’s going to take non-profits and businesses doing their part through alliances like America’s Promise. WHAT EXACTLY DOES THAT MEAN? It will take parent’s getting involved in their child’s education consistently. HOW CAN PARENTS DO IT CONSISTENTLY WHEN YOU MENTION VARIOUS SUPPORT AND TAX DOLLARS FROM OTHERS? Going to parent-teacher conferences, AGREE! helping them with their homework. HELP THEM WITH THEIR HOMEWORK? WE'VE BEEN DEPROGRAMMING MY YOUNGEST FOR A WHILE. GOVERNMENT EDUCATION HAS BECOME A DIRECT CONFLICT OF PARENTAL UPBRINGING. GOOD EDUCATION DOESN'T NEED GOVERNMENT. ALL GOVERNMENT IS, IS WASTE TO FREE, INDIVIDUAL THINKING.

      Mr. President, thank you for your transparency.

    2. Judy K. Warner, Rohr says:

      The dropout rate is always considered a problem to be solved by getting more kids to stay in school. What if it were solved by legalizing dropping out at an earlier age, and making it easier for young people to enter the workplace? What if apprenticeships were not controlled by unions? What if young people could be paid a sub-minimum wage? What if young people could strike out on their own as small businesses without so much government interference that you need a lawyer and an accountant do do so? What if regulations regarding home schooling were eased and included non-traditional definitions of education?

      In my opinion the dropout rate will continue to be "unacceptably high" as long as schools try to make little boys into little girls, make the curriculum politically correct and boring, continue to decrease the amount of physical activity during the day, and close shop classes and other trade-oriented programs. Most proposals seem to me to be just gifts to the teachers' unions. Maryland is now considering raising the compulsory schooling age to 18, and if it passes I expect to be paying higher taxes to pay for all the extra teachers and other expenses this will entail, to no good purpose.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×