• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Iraqis Vote Despite Violence: Now Comes the Hard Part

    Iraqi Election

    Despite insurgent threats to murder Iraqis who dared to vote in the parliamentary elections, yesterday’s Iraqi elections went as well as could be expected. There were dozens of bombs that exploded in Baghdad and other cities, killing at least 36 people, but many Iraqis shrugged off the violence and risked their lives to vote.

    The turnout was estimated to be about 62 percent of Iraq’s 19 million eligible voters, which is down from the estimated 76 percent turnout in the last parliamentary elections in December 2005. But a positive sign was that turnout in Sunni Arab areas appears to have increased significantly over 2005, when many Sunnis boycotted the elections. This could lead to greater Sunni participation in the next government, which could further weaken Iraq’s faltering insurgency. Also, this time around the security duties were handled by Iraq’s security services instead of the 96,000 U.S. troops still in the country.

    The full results of the voting are not likely to be known before Thursday. But early projections assess that Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s State of Law coalition appears to be the frontrunner, with former Prime Minister Ayad Allawi’s Iraqiya alliance, a secular nationalist coalition, and the Iraq National Alliance, a grouping of Shia religious parties backed by Iran, vying to place second.

    No political coalition is expected to gain the 163 seats necessary to form a government in the 325 seat parliament. This will lead to extensive post-election negotiations between the three big Shia-led parties, the Kurdish coalition, and many smaller Sunni, Shia, Christian and independent parties. For a list of the various political parties see: Guide to the Iraqi Elections.

    The election by itself is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for resolving Iraq’s major internal disputes, including disagreements over power sharing, the sharing of oil revenues, how to ease ethnic and sectarian tensions, territorial disputes (particularly between the Kurds, Arabs, Turkmen and Christian minorities in the north), and the relationship between the central government and regional governments. The real test will come in the months ahead, as Iraqis form a coalition government that must effectively resolve these problems.

    For more on U.S. Policy and Iraq, see: Charting U.S. Policy After Iraq’s Elections

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Iraqis Vote Despite Violence: Now Comes the Hard Part

    1. Ben C. Ann Arbor, MI says:

      Iraqiis are to be commended for their voter turnout. In our last election we had a turn out of 56% and without the overt threat of death. So which country embraces democracy more?

    2. Glenn Richardson, He says:

      Prior to our war to liberate the people of Iraq there was no opportunity to vote except for Saddam. Now, because of the success of the Bush foreign policy the people of Iraq can run for office, vote and elect people other than a dictator. I believe it is wonderful that we have been able to be a part of giving this right to their people. Yes, it cost lives but Freedom has always cost lives. Our own freedom from England actually cost French lives as well as our own.

    3. Scott Heald, Boston says:

      Mr. Phillips:

      I read your posting with interest. Most of the article is informative, revealing similar facts to those published in many other news outlets. But I object to one phrase that I deem overly positive, that the elections had gone "about as well as could be expected". How would you like to be the person to translate the meaning of that phrase into Arabic for the family members of those killed in vote-related violence on voting day? None of this takes away from the heroism of those millions who did vote, but it seems to me you are applying a double standard that you would not tolerate if similar violence occurred here in the US.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×