• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Home Court Advantage Didn't Help Obama

    Health Care Summit

    President Obama used his health care summit to give his side every advantage possible. Whenever opponents spoke, he got to respond. By appointing himself the moderator, Obama gave himself the first word, the last word, and the most words.

    Overall, Obama gave Democrats over twice as much speaking time as Republicans. The 17 GOP’ers attending received a collective 110 minutes. By himself, Obama hogged 119 minutes of microphone time and gave his 21 fellow Democrats an additional 114 minutes. When called to account for this, Obama proclaimed it fair because, “I’m the President.”

    Obama exercised free rein to cut off opponents, speak sharply, and pass judgment on whether others’ arguments were legitimate. He wasn’t just a player; he also was the referee.

    Despite giving his side all the advantages, most commentators agree that Republicans held their own or even carried the day. CNN’s David Gergen proclaimed that Republicans “had their best day in years.”

    A key moment was when Obama—arguing passionately with Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN)–claimed his plan would reduce the cost of private health insurance, and then the President was forced publicly to back down from that claim.

    As media such as the Daily Caller reported:

    Later in the session, after an aide handed the president a note, Obama admitted he had been wrong: ‘What the Congressional Budget Office is saying is, is that if I now have the opportunity to actually buy a decent package inside the exchange, that costs me about 10% to 13% more but is actually real insurance, then there are going to be a bunch of people who take advantage of that. So yes, I’m paying 10% to 13% more because instead of buying an apple, I’m getting an orange.’

    It was a crucial point because, for many Americans, the key issue is not whether government provides health care for the uninsured, but whether it lowers costs for the already-insured. Whether the number of uninsured is estimated at 30 million or 46 million (and both numbers are deceptive, it still represents only 10-15% of the population.

    Among  the 85-90% of Americans who have insurance, the main concern is affordability, not availability. Obama’s most important health reform promise to them was his oft-repeated pledge to lower their health insurance costs by $2,500 per year. Being forced to admit on live television that his plan fails to do that—and instead increases premiums—was the low point of the summit for the President.

    As Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ) noted, “It’s just another example of why because the bill has to raise so much money, it ends up hurting the very people that we want to help.”

    Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) offered Obama a clear chance to embrace a premium-reducing solution. For example, she said, those Californians who face up to 39 percent increases in premiums should be given “the ability to go to Oregon, where they could buy a policy for 25 percent less, or individuals in New Jersey who could go to Pennsylvania and buy a policy and lower their cost 26 percent, or go to Wisconsin and buy one and lower their cost 74 percent.”

    The need for a plan that lowers premiums rather than increases them is a major reason why the best course for Congress would be to start over. Lawmakers should take a different approach, rather than try to ram through Obamacare and impose it on a country that does not want it.

    Posted in Obamacare [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to Home Court Advantage Didn't Help Obama

    1. bigdave, ocala fl says:

      Heard the liar Pelosi refer to Obama's initial BIPARTISAN discussion of the healthcare bill. Can't wait for this monstrous person to disappear from the political scene, and that other old woman Harry Reid with her. BIPARTISAN is a demorat term for LOCK OUT THE REPUBLICANS CAUSE THE MEDIA WILL LIE FOR US AND COVER OUR TRACKS…except for HERITAGE and FOX NEWS and TALK RADIO, THE ONLY SOURCES FOR THE TRUTH! Obama's lack of experience, lack of knowledge, lack of ability to LISTEN finally on display on the "SHOW"! No wonder he broke his word for over a year about televising the proceedings! He knew he would be caught BRAINDEAD! A little psychology lesson here: Defensiveness and arrogance equal LACK OF KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE SUBJECT AT HAND. This little man is so over his head it is PATHETIC TO WATCH! President? YIKES!

    2. Don, Bismarck, ND says:

      Very well said bigdave. The only job he ever had was to rile up the natives in Chicago. And those people thought it world work nationally. He is an empty suit loser who has no idea about much of anything. They say he taught Constitutional law. I wonder what that was like.

    3. 1441 Powhatan rd. Cl says:

      A very interesting exchange of ideas between the liberal democrats and the conservative republicans. We have been hearing for months the opposing sides, but not all in the same room. Clearly the democrats our back up on their heals defending their go it alone approach that is inevitable. While the Conservatiive republicans are getting alot of atrraction right now from the country.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.