• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Who is Going to Pay for FEMA?

    Department of Homeland Security

    Looks like Mother Nature didn’t get the message about the budget crises in most of the states. So, she twice dumped a bunch of snow on the Midwest and East that required states, cities, and counties to plow – in between frantic calls to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for reinforcements.

    The calls prompted FEMA to fire-up its fleet of snowplows and dispatch its army of snow shovel crews. Not really. FEMA doesn’t have snowplows or snow shovel crews, so why the frantic calls to Washington? Answer: FEMA has money and, when it declares a disaster, it pays for 75 percent or more of the costs. So, the calls to FEMA are really about getting taxpayers outside of the impacted states to subsidize the snow removal costs in the Midwest and East.

    Unfortunately, this cost-shifting move by governors isn’t new. In 1993, FEMA started issuing a greater number of declarations for natural disasters that historically had been handled and paid for entirely by the states. Like most things, we have federalized routine natural disasters in America so that Washington subsidizes virtually every flood, fire, or tornado.

    From 1981 to 1993, FEMA issued on average a meager 43 declarations per year. From 1993 to 2001, President Bill Clinton approved on average 89 FEMA declarations per year, including the record of 157 in his reelection year. To prove the bipartisanship aspect of FEMA, President George W. Bush approved on average 130 declarations per year. President Obama started strong with 108 FEMA declarations – in a year devoid of hurricanes or earthquakes.

    Since 1953, FEMA has issued 294 declarations due to winter storms. Of those, 37 were issued from 1953 to 1992, roughly one winter storm declaration per year. In contrast, the other 257, or 87 percent, occurred over the last 17 years – 15 winter storm declarations annually. Clinton’s FEMA accounted for 108 of those declarations, Bush’s FEMA 128, and Obama’s FEMA has 21 so far, putting him on track for roughly 160 such declarations should he serve two terms. The problem is the money isn’t free.

    The other problem is that a November rule change may prevent states from pushing their snow removal costs to FEMA. The rule for an emergency declaration requires the snowfalls to occur within a 48-hour period. The two storms that hit the Midwest and East this month were separated by about 72 hours, which means each snowstorm would have to be significant enough on its own to qualify for federal aid. In most states, they don’t. In fact, as of today, only New Jersey has qualified for a FEMA declaration. So, now the pressure will build from governors and their congressional delegations to get FEMA to waive the new rule. With all of the snow-covered states already facing enormous budget deficits, there is no money to pay for the snow removal.

    With the federalization of natural disasters, states have learned they don’t have to plan or set aside funds. FEMA will pay. This mentality is what has us in the fiscal mess we are in. It is high time this federalization movement comes to a halt and for states to plan and budget for their known costs.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Who is Going to Pay for FEMA?

    1. Ozzy6900 says:

      FEMA should be for disasters, not simple storms. Those of us who live in snow areas like the Northeast, should be prepared for winter. We know that winter means snow and sometimes a lot. The Blizzard of 1978 was more that we could handle so we needed help but our resources were out there also. In other words, we were looking for ASSISTANCE not a hand out. The aftermath of Hurricane Katrina is a perfect example of this. No help from the State of Louisiana, no help from the City of New Orleans. Everyone had their hands turned toward Washington DC instead of turning their hands to each other. It is not the job of the Government to step in for every little thing! Your State should be prepared for what normally comes its way be it snow, mud, hurricane or tornado. I can see FL needing help with snow removal and CT with a mud slide. These are not normal occurrences in these states. But snow comes to CT every year an so do tornadoes (lately). Mud slides occur in CA and hurricanes occur in the Gulf and the Atlantic Seaboard. These States need to be prepared. The taxpayer in AZ should not be paying for snow removal in Washington DC. Neither should the CT taxpayer be paying for a mud slide in CA.

    2. Bobbie Jay says:

      Totally agree. I would think snow that has fallen in the otherwise warmer states will have the benefit of mother nature removing it for them a lot quicker then the northern states and at no cost! Clear the roads and sidewalks, let people take care of their businesses and residences, let the warmth and the sun, take their course.

    3. Anon says:

      it looks like the people in each state needs to get off their butts and get out there and come together as a state. Why would anyone need to pay for snow removal or mudslide clean up? You get out there and start shoveling. my God what has happened to america; You have homeowners insurance flood mud snow insurance if you don't then the community all pitches in a few bucks and helps the people get back up on their feet this is how America is suppose to work Fema is bullcrap

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×