• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Biomass Gets Tax Break, Oil & Gas Get Tax Hike

    With wind, solar and geothermal receiving much of the government handouts when it comes to energy production, biomass is back in the game after the Senate Finance Committee unveiled its tax extender plan, which includes a $100 million in production tax credits for biomass energy as part of a larger tax extender package. Politico reports,

    As drafted, Section 503 breathed new life into an unusual production tax credit, first awarded to the industry in 2004 as part of a one-time, five-year deal benefiting nearly 80 biomass electric-generating plants, most of which were up and running well before the tax break was enacted. The House balked at renewing this bargain in December, saying production tax credits are to spur new production, not to subsidize old. But Finance subtly changes the old wording from five years to six, thereby adding 12 months to a tax break that is typically worth about $1.75 million annually for a qualified 20-megawatt plant.”

    So if biomass production received government support when it wasn’t needed, why does it need more help now? Robert Cleaves, president of the Biomass Power Association, answers, “The production tax credit is really a lifeline for the industry. It’s not a windfall. We’re on the ragged edge as it is.” This should be a pretty convincing indicator that biomass is currently an uncompetitive product and might not be in the market without production tax credits. Biomass, one of the cheaper renewable energy sources, may play a role in America’s energy portfolio, but if it cannot compete in the market, it doesn’t deserve to be there. And biomass isn’t as environmentally friendly as some might suggest.

    Billionaire Sam Zell is a financial supporter of biomass. He also bought the Chicago Tribune in 2007, only to see it go bankrupt by the end of 2008. “[I]f you bought something and it’s now worth a great deal less, you made a mistake. And I’m more than willing to say that I made a mistake. I was too optimistic in terms of the newspaper’s ability to preserve its position,” said Zell after the paper went under. Maybe he should consider the same for biomass. Although Senator Harry Reid stripped the tax extenders set to expire at the end of the year from the larger jobs bill, the $31 billion in tax extenders could be broken out into a separate bill.

    This comes at a time when President Obama’s budget plans to reduce the deficit by eliminating $36.5 billion in tax breaks to the oil and natural gas industry. Without removing tax breaks and subsidies to other sources of energy, this is essentially a tax increase on our proven sources of energy. The Americans for Tax Reform has more here.

    Removing government support for energy production isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but it should be done across the board. A good starting point would be to ending the special tax breaks for biomass.

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    6 Responses to Biomass Gets Tax Break, Oil & Gas Get Tax Hike

    1. Ozzy6900, CT says:

      We need oil for heating and gasoline and we need gas for heating, cooking and in many places, making electric power. So President Obama decides to penalize all of us by essentially raising taxes on the most important things we need. This just proves what an absolute moron the President really is! He lives in a dream world while the rest of us have to live in this world.

    2. Bobbie Jay says:

      The pattern is, give to what fails and will continue to fail. Find all ways to steal from others. Gotta crumble the currency.

      Would be the duty of a government with dignity and the honor to uphold the Constitution, to keep taxes low at all government costs, limit government as people live free.

      There's still time to change the road your on, Mr. Obama.

    3. Brad, Detroit, MI says:

      Subsidize failure and poverty and you will end up with more of both.

    4. Perry, OK says:

      I for one am for the tax breaks to biomass producers and users. The effect of stimulating a new and enlarging an existing program that has more appeal to more people is a great boon for all of us. We need to adopt the usage of biomass in greater quanities and in more diverse appications. The use of tax breaks needs to have a time line and follow up, to insure quality not so much quanity. If it is abused let us hand the offinders quickly, to save even more money. That's what this is all about anyway. At least with biomass we are using something we were disguarding anyway.

    5. Tim Az says:

      Looks like the biomass generator near me will be shuting down about the same time as his pal Mao-Bama. I can't wait to celebrate. All this green energy is about corperate welfare and a return in campaign contributions to continuing fleecing the American citizenry.

    6. Mike, Wichita Falls says:

      1) If the biomass "program" really appealed to more people, wouldn't the demand for it increase? Wouldn't this increased demand result in a higher price for biomass fuels? Wouldn't this higher price negate the so-called need for tax breaks not equally enjoyed by other programs such as wind, solar and petroleum?

      2) The quality of any program will be insured by the free market. Consumers spend their money on the best product or service, and investors seek out the best return on their money. If quality suffers, people take their business elsewhere.

      3) One sure way to stimulate all programs is for the government at all levels to take less of the revenue generated, insure equitable takings and remove regulations. The quality and quanitity of that product or service will increase.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.